@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Jaguar I-Pace vs Volvo XC40 – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar I-Pace or Volvo XC40?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

I-Pace @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo XC40 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Jaguar I-Pace costs 79200 £. That’s a price difference of around 42438 £.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar I-Pace has a significantly edge – offering 400 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 203 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar I-Pace is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.80 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Jaguar I-Pace performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Jaguar I-Pace pulls convincingly stronger with 696 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 396 Nm difference.

I-Pace @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is distinct lighter – 1688 kg compared to 2226 kg. The difference is around 538 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Jaguar I-Pace offers noticeable more room – 638 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 186 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Jaguar I-Pace performs barely noticeable better – up to 1453 L, which is about 125 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 a bit takes the win – 532 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 88 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Jaguar I-Pace proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Jaguar I-Pace is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £79,200
I-Pace @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Jaguar I-Pace

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 400 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 25.20 kWh
  • Electric Range : 469 km
details

Jaguar I-Pace

The Jaguar I-Pace represents a remarkable fusion of cutting-edge electric performance and iconic British luxury. With its sleek design and spacious interior, this model redefines what one can expect from an electric vehicle in terms of style and comfort. Its impressive driving dynamics and advanced technology make it a standout choice for those looking to make a statement on the road.

details
Jag_I-PACE_22MY_Black_Exterior_20.04.21_001 @ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Jag_I-PACE_22MY_Black_Exterior_20.04.21_002 @ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Jag_I-PACE_21MY_Interior_23.06.20_001_HomeScreen @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Volvo XC40

5 (2)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Jaguar I-Pace
Volvo XC40
I-Pace @ Jaguar Land Rover Media
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
79200 - 85500 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
25.20 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
469 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
84.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2226 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
638 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4682 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
2011 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1566 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1453 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
444 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
400 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.80 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
696 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
294 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Lexus LBX and Volvo XC40 stand out with their distinctive styles and premium features. The LBX impresses with its sleek design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers, while the XC40 offers a robust driving experience and top-notch …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda HR-V
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda HR-V stands out for its versatile cargo space and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced safety features, appealing to those seeking …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
What drivetrain options does the Jaguar I-Pace have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.