VS

Jeep Avenger vs Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 1,050 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 420,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster?

Jeep Avenger vs Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster: Key differences

Jeep Avenger

4 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • considerably lighter
details

Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

  • significantly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Avenger

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Jeep Avenger is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster costs 420,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 397,458 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Avenger uses 4.9 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster with 9.3 L/100km. The difference is about 4.4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Jeep Avenger offers clearly more range – reaching up to 400 km, about 375 km more than the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster.

849 Testarossa Roadster

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster offers significantly more power – delivering 1,050 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 894 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.3 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 6.7 s quicker.

Avenger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Jeep Avenger offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is considerably lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,660 kg. The difference is around 480 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Avenger holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,500
Avenger

Jeep Avenger

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 100 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 400 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Renault R4
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Renault 4 make for an intriguing matchup: one is a compact, tech-rich electric SUV aimed at urban adventurers, the other a revived classic that trades flash for charm, simplicity and everyday practicality. Choosing between them comes down to priorities — modern performance, …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
Jeep Avenger
Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4 (8 Reviews)
rate
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mauro
19 Feb 2026, 10:57:10

Jeep is no longer the reliable brand it once was, and the Avenger shows the effects of poor overall quality. Cute, but uncomfortable (narrow seats... you hurt your hand trying to buckle the seatbelt!)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

The Ferrari Testarossa Roadster strips the classic wedge-shaped drama down to open-top glamour, ensuring you arrive with presence and a grin. Behind the wheel it delivers a theatrical soundtrack and analogue charisma that will reward collectors and spirited drivers alike.

details
serpimg_Wp6wLc

Reviews Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Alfa Romeo Junior
Jeep Avenger
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Alfa Romeo Junior emerges as a stylish contender with its sleek Italian design and sporty performance, while the Jeep Avenger boasts rugged capabilities and an adventurous spirit. The Junior appeals to enthusiasts seeking a dynamic driving experience, whereas the …
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger
VS
Ford Puma and Jeep Avenger go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Jeep Avenger
Opel Frontera
VS
The Jeep Avenger is a cheeky, compact crossover that dresses up like an off-roader but thrives in the city — zippy, efficient and ideal if you want Jeep styling without the gas-guzzling bravado. The Opel Frontera, by contrast, is a more grown-up SUV: roomier, practical and better suited to family …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Renegade
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Renegade both wear the Jeep badge but aim at different buyers: the Avenger is a newer, city-focused compact (with an electric option in many markets), while the Renegade is a bigger, more rugged small SUV with broader engine choices. This comparison highlights the key …
Jeep Avenger
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The all‑electric Jeep Avenger packs Jeep’s chunky styling into a city‑friendly crossover with brisk EV torque and cheeky off‑road looks — perfect for buyers who want electric motoring with attitude, even if it’s more boulevard than boulder. The Toyota Yaris Cross, meanwhile, swaps glamour for …
Jeep Avenger
Nissan Juke
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Jeep Avenger and Nissan Juke each offer a unique blend of style and functionality. The Jeep Avenger impresses with its rugged off-road capability and robust build, true to Jeep's adventurous spirit, making it an ideal choice for those who crave outdoor excursions. …
Jeep Avenger
Opel Mokka
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Opel Mokka are two compact crossovers with very different personalities — the Avenger wears its Jeep ruggedness and EV chops on its sleeve, while the Mokka is a sharper, more urban-focused package with chic styling and a polished cabin. If you want an adventurous, value-packed …
Fiat 600
Jeep Avenger
VS
In the dynamic realm of urban mobility, the Fiat 600 and Jeep Avenger emerge as compelling contenders, each catering to distinct lifestyle preferences. The Fiat 600 excels in compact maneuverability and stylish design, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers, while the Jeep Avenger showcases …
Jeep Avenger
Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,500 - 35,000 £
Price
420,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
9.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
400 km
Electric Range
25 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
212 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Curb weight
1,660 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,776 mm
Width
1,999 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
494 - 502 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Power HP
1,050 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
8
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
772 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
3,990 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Ferrari
Is the Jeep Avenger offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Avenger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.