Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jeep Avenger vs Mercedes EQS SUV - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (156 HP vs 658 HP), boot space and price (21900 £ vs 95000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Mercedes EQS SUV?
Avenger
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Avenger has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21900 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 73030 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Jeep Avenger: with 15.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly perceptible more efficient than the Mercedes EQS SUV with 19.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 4.10 kWh.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs convincingly better – achieving up to 695 km, about 295 km more than the Jeep Avenger.
EQS SUV
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV has a significantly edge – offering 658 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 502 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 4.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Jeep Avenger tops out at 194 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQS SUV pulls decisively stronger with 950 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 690 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Avenger
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is decisively lighter – 1180 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 1515 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers convincingly more room – 645 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 265 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs noticeable better – up to 2100 L, which is about 823 L more than the Jeep Avenger.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQS SUV somewhat takes the win – 570 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 68 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Mercedes EQS SUV shows itself to be performs better in key areas and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £95,000
Mercedes EQS SUV
Jeep Avenger
Mercedes EQS SUV
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jeep Avenger
5 (2 Reviews)
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
details
Jeep Avenger
Mercedes EQS SUV
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21900 - 36900 £
|
Price
95000 - 212100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
|
Curb weight
2695 - 3075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
|
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
|
Length
5125 mm
|
|
Width
1776 mm
|
Width
1959 - 2034 mm
|
|
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
|
Height
1718 - 1721 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2100 L
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
What drivetrain options does the Jeep Avenger have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.