Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jeep Compass vs Renault Arkana comparison
Compare performance (225 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Renault Arkana?
Jeep Compass vs Renault Arkana: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Compass
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,743 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass offers clearly more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Compass is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Compass delivers significantly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.
Compass
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is somewhat lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 157 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jeep Compass stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £34,200
Jeep Compass
Jeep Compass
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Jeep Compass
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,552 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
|
Height
1,675 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,561 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.