Compare performance (225 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 40,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or VW Tayron?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive landscape is crowded with SUVs, each vying for the attention of adventure-seekers and daily commuters alike. The Jeep Compass and VW Tayron stand out as contenders in this competitive field. Both vehicles offer unique strengths, appealing to different types of drivers. Dive in as we explore these two models in detail, comparing technical aspects, innovations, and performance.
The Jeep Compass, model year 2024, brings a fair amount of power to the table. It offers a range of power outputs: 130, 190, and 240 HP, all channeled through either a front-wheel drive or an all-wheel drive system. Its acceleration varies from 10.3 to 7.3 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint, depending on the configuration.
Matching up against the Compass is the VW Tayron, model year 2025, with a more extensive range of engine options. Power outputs for the Tayron span from 150 to a robust 272 HP. The Tayron's most powerful variant achieves 0-100 km/h in just 6.1 seconds. Both SUVs employ an automatic transmission, but the Tayron exclusively features a dual-clutch automatic system.
Efficiency plays a crucial role for consumers, especially those concerned about environmental impact. The Jeep Compass offers fuel consumption figures between 5.5 and 2 L/100 km, reflecting its hybrid technology prowess. Its CO2 emissions range from 123 to 48 g/km, and the plug-in hybrid version provides an electric range of 36 km.
On the other hand, the VW Tayron showcases its superiority in plug-in hybrid technology with an impressive electric range reaching up to 126 km. Fuel consumption figures start at 0.4 L/100 km for the hybrid versions but can reach up to 7.8 L/100 km in its more conventional powertrains. CO2 emissions range from a mere 9 g/km, showcasing its commendable efficiency class ratings.
In terms of size, the VW Tayron is larger, with a length of 4792 mm compared to the Compass's 4404 mm. This translates to more interior space and a significantly larger trunk capacity of up to 885 liters, dwarfing the Compass's maximum of 438 liters. While both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers, the Tayron’s extra dimensions make it a better choice for those needing extra storage without sacrificing passenger space.
Both SUVs offer advanced technologies enhancing safety and driving enjoyment. The Jeep Compass is equipped with features like adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance, making long drives safer and less stressful. The VW Tayron ups the ante with cutting-edge infotainment and connectivity options, as well as superior driver assistance systems, ensuring it remains a step ahead in terms of technological offerings.
Choosing between the Jeep Compass and VW Tayron ultimately depends on your priorities. The Compass, with its compact build and lower price point, offers a rugged yet efficient option well-suited for urban environments and light off-road excursions. The Tayron, meanwhile, provides a more luxurious experience, with greater power options, a larger boot, and advanced hybrid technology, making it ideal for those who need more space and range.
Whichever SUV appeals to you, both the Jeep Compass and VW Tayron represent stellar examples of modern automotive innovation, catering to the diverse needs of contemporary drivers.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Jeep Compass is moderately cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the VW Tayron costs 40,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,021 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Tayron uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Jeep Compass offers considerably more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 377 km more than the VW Tayron.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Tayron offers somewhat more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Tayron is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.1 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Tayron delivers slightly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Compass is marginally lighter – 1,667 kg compared to 1,682 kg. The difference is around 15 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW Tayron offers clearly more boot space – 885 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 335 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW Tayron carries slightly more – 573 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.
The VW Tayron is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
The VW Tayron combines a roomy, practical interior with a composed, comfortable ride that suits both daily commuting and longer journeys. With a restrained, modern design and a focus on straightforward tech and safety, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want Volkswagen refinement without unnecessary flash.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
40,200 - 56,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 123 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 127 g/km
|
co2
33 - 192 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
1,682 - 1,948 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
705 - 885 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,853 - 1,866 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
472 - 473 kg
|
Payload
497 - 573 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B, G
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España