VS

Kia Ceed vs Skoda Karoq – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Kia Ceed or Skoda Karoq fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Kia Ceed has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23500 £, while the Skoda Karoq costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 5605 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Karoq manages with 4.90 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Kia Ceed with 6 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Karoq has a evident edge – offering 190 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Kia Ceed takes 9.50 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Karoq performs to a small extent better – reaching 221 km/h, while the Kia Ceed tops out at 197 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Karoq pulls evident stronger with 360 Nm compared to 253 Nm. That’s about 107 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Ceed is barely noticeable lighter – 1298 kg compared to 1380 kg. The difference is around 82 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers clearly perceptible more room – 521 L compared to 395 L. That’s a difference of about 126 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq performs evident better – up to 1630 L, which is about 339 L more than the Kia Ceed.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Karoq slightly takes the win – 549 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Karoq proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Karoq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £29,100
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497

Skoda Karoq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 190 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 7.6 L
details

Kia Ceed

The Kia Ceed stands out in the compact car segment with its sleek design and impressive handling. It offers a comfortable and well-equipped interior that appeals to both drivers and passengers. With its efficient engine options, the Ceed provides a smooth and enjoyable driving experience suitable for city commutes and longer journeys alike.

details
Kia_Ceed_GT_Line_MJ22_01 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Ceed_GT_Line_MJ22_02 @ press.kia.com
Kia_XCeed_MJ2023_Innen @ press.kia.com

Skoda Karoq

5 (1)
rate

The Skoda Karoq is a versatile compact SUV that combines practicality with a stylish design. Its interior is spacious and well-appointed, offering a comfortable ride for both driver and passengers. With advanced technology features, it ensures a connected and safe driving experience.

details
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497 @ skoda-media.de
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113477 @ skoda-media.de
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113491 @ skoda-media.de
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113481 @ skoda-media.de
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113494 @ skoda-media.de

Similar Comparisons

Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Karoq emerge as strong contenders, each offering a blend of practicality and style. The Tucson impresses with its bold design and advanced technology features, while the Karoq stands out for its spacious interior and excellent driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these two well-rounded vehicles boils down to personal preference and priorities, whether it's tech-savvy comfort or agility on the road.
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Skoda Karoq enter a competitive arena with their compelling blend of style, practicality, and performance. The CX-5 captivates with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, while the Karoq impresses with its spacious interior and user-friendly technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two SUVs will depend on whether you prioritize sporty handling or versatile functionality.
Kia Ceed
Skoda Karoq
Ceed
Karoq

Costs and Consumption
Price
23500 - 26300 £
Price
29100 - 41700 £
Consumption L/100km
6 - 6.4 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
137 - 146 g/km
co2
128 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1298 - 1372 kg
Curb weight
1380 - 1655 kg
Trunk capacity
357 - 395 L
Trunk capacity
521 L
Length
4315 mm
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
Width
1800 mm
Width
1841 mm
Height
1447 mm
Height
1624 - 1629 mm
Max trunk capacity
1253 - 1291 L
Max trunk capacity
1630 L
Payload
478 - 490 kg
Payload
456 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 140 HP
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 13.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Max Speed
178 - 197 km/h
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
Torque
172 - 253 Nm
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
74 - 103 kW
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1482 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
Brand
Kia
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Dacia Duster
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Dacia Duster and Skoda Karoq emerge as strong contenders, each catering to distinct buyer preferences. The Duster offers an impressive value proposition with its rugged design and practical features, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious adventurers. Meanwhile, the Karoq impresses with its refined interior, advanced technology, and dynamic handling, appealing to those seeking a more premium driving experience.
Kia Ceed
Kia XCeed
VS
In the battle between the Kia Ceed and Kia XCeed, both models showcase the brand's commitment to quality and performance, yet cater to different driving preferences. The Ceed offers a sporty hatchback experience with agile handling, while the XCeed presents a more elevated crossover stance, blending versatility with distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between the two comes down to whether you prioritize dynamic driving or a more spacious, commanding position on the road.
Kia Ceed
Kia Stonic
VS
In the competitive compact segment, the Kia Ceed and Kia Stonic each offer unique advantages tailored to different lifestyles. The Ceed impresses with its spacious interior and refined ride quality, making it a strong choice for families or those who prioritize comfort on longer journeys. In contrast, the Stonic delivers a sportier, more agile driving experience, appealing to urban dwellers seeking style and maneuverability in a compact SUV.
Kia Sportage
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Kia Sportage and Skoda Karoq stand out with their impressive blend of style and functionality. While the Sportage boasts a bold design with advanced tech features, the Karoq emphasizes practicality and spaciousness, making it a top choice for families. Ultimately, both vehicles offer excellent performance and comfort, but each caters to different preferences in design and utility.
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq and the Volvo XC40 go head-to-head in the compact SUV segment, each bringing unique advantages to potential buyers. The Karoq impresses with its practicality, offering generous cargo space and efficient engine options, making it an ideal choice for families and long journeys. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its chic Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, appealing to buyers with a penchant for style and cutting-edge technology.
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Roc present two compelling options for buyers seeking style and practicality. While the Karoq boasts a more spacious interior and generous cargo capacity, the T-Roc stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on individual preferences for versatility versus flair.
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stands out with its sleek design and efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban adventures, while the Skoda Karoq offers remarkable practicality and interior space, appealing to families and long-distance travelers. Both crossovers come equipped with a suite of advanced technology and safety features, though the Skoda often steals the spotlight with its user-friendly infotainment system. Ultimately, the decision between the two may rest on personal preference, whether one prioritizes style and fuel economy or space and comfort.
Skoda Karoq
Toyota RAV4
VS
What drivetrain options does the Kia Ceed have?

The Kia Ceed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.