Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Kia Niro vs Mazda CX-80 comparison
Compare performance (138 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Mazda CX-80?
Kia Niro vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Niro
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Kia Niro is considerably cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,194 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Kia Niro with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
CX-80
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers significantly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 189 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 285 Nm more.
Niro
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Kia Niro is considerably lighter – 1,474 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 657 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Kia Niro offers considerably more boot space – 451 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 193 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 184 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-80 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,300
Mazda CX-80
Kia Niro
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Kia Niro
The Kia Niro is a practical crossover that blends economy and everyday versatility without sacrificing comfort. With a roomy, well-laid-out cabin and calm, composed handling, it’s an easy-to-live-with choice for commuters and families.
details
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Kia Niro
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,474 kg
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
451 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.