VS

Kia Niro vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (138 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Nissan Juke?

Kia Niro vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

Kia Niro

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more efficient
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Niro

The Compact SUV Showdown: Kia Niro vs. Nissan Juke

With the automotive world continually evolving, compact SUVs like the Kia Niro and Nissan Juke have captured the interest of consumers looking for versatility and efficiency. These two models blend advanced technologies with practical features, catering to diverse driving needs. Let's delve into a comparison of their design, performance, and innovations to see which one suits your lifestyle best.

Juke

Design and Dimensions

The Kia Niro and Nissan Juke both embrace the compact SUV framework, offering bold yet distinct styling. The Niro measures 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and stands 1545 mm tall, giving it a robust road presence. In contrast, the Juke is slightly shorter and taller with dimensions of 4210 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and a height of 1593 mm.

Both vehicles provide ample space with five doors and a seating capacity for five passengers. The Niro offers a slightly larger trunk capacity at 451 L, whereas the Juke follows closely with up to 422 L of storage space, making both suitable for weekend getaways and urban errands.

Niro

Engine and Performance

The Kia Niro offers a choice between Full Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid options, generating power from 129 HP to 171 HP. Driven with a Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission and Front-Wheel Drive, the Niro accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 10.4 seconds for the plug-in variant, and a top speed of 161 km/h. The vehicle's fuel consumption ranges from 4.4 L/100 km to a remarkable 0.8 L/100 km in its plug-in hybrid form, highlighting its focus on efficiency.

Nissan’s Juke comes with petrol and full hybrid options, offering horsepower between 114 HP to 143 HP. The Juke, also a Front-Wheel Drive, can transition from 0 to 100 km/h in around 10.1 seconds in its hybrid guise, achieving a top speed of 180 km/h. Fuel consumption varies from 4.7 L/100 km to 6 L/100 km depending on the option chosen.

Juke

Technological Innovations

Both vehicles are packed with modern innovations. The Kia Niro’s hybrids are equipped with either a 1.3 kWh or an impressive 11.1 kWh battery capacity, offering an electric range of up to 65 km. This makes the Niro an attractive option for those looking to reduce their carbon footprint, with CO2 emissions as low as 19 g/km.

The Nissan Juke’s hybrid model features a 0.6 kWh battery, providing a balanced performance while maintaining a lower CO2 output of 107 g/km. It's designed for those who crave nimbler urban driving and quick getaways with a more traditional automotive experience.

Niro

Interior Comfort and Features

Inside, both vehicles focus on driver and passenger comfort with a suite of features designed for convenience. Both models upholster their cabins with modern materials and incorporate technology that's easy to use while on the move, ensuring a connected and controlled driving experience.

The Kia Niro stands out with its efficiency-driven features, appealing to those environmentally conscious consumers, while the Juke brings a sporty edge to its design, enticing those who value spirited driving with a keen sense for style and technology.

Juke

Conclusion

Choosing between the Kia Niro and Nissan Juke ultimately comes down to preferences in efficiency, style, and technology. The Niro excels in sustainable driving with its hybrid technologies, while the Juke offers a sportier driving experience with innovative features. Both vehicles offer compelling packages for the modern driver, making either choice a worthwhile investment for those stepping into the compact SUV market.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Kia EV3
Kia Niro
VS
The Kia EV3 arrives like a tech-savvy upstart — all-electric, sharp to drive and crammed with the latest infotainment and safety kit, ideal if you want a compact crossover that feels like the future. The Niro, meanwhile, stays the sensible all‑rounder: proven, roomy and available as a hybrid, …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Juke is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,749 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Kia Niro uses 4.5 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Juke offers marginally more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Juke is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 10.1 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia Niro delivers noticeably more torque with 265 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.

Niro

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is somewhat lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,474 kg. The difference is around 200 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Kia Niro offers only slightly more boot space – 451 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.

When it comes to payload, the Kia Niro carries only slightly more – 466 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Juke holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
Juke

Nissan Juke

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 114 - 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 - 6 L/100km
details
Kia Niro
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Niro

The Kia Niro is a practical crossover that blends economy and everyday versatility without sacrificing comfort. With a roomy, well-laid-out cabin and calm, composed handling, it’s an easy-to-live-with choice for commuters and families.

details
Kia_Niro_HEV_08
Kia_Niro_HEV_24
Kia_Niro_HEV_22
Kia_Niro_HEV_05
Kia_Niro_HEV_13

Reviews Kia Niro

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Archi
25 Mar 2026, 13:11:41

Efficient, functional, understated, spacious and comfortable. No surprises: it delivers what it promises and does its job without fanfare. Good buy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Wolfgang Schäfer
21 Oct 2025, 14:01:32

I've been driving the Kia Niro since 2019 and am still very happy with this car.

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Frequently compared as well

Kia Niro
Kia XCeed
VS
It's the compact-crossover face-off that asks whether you crave wallet-friendly efficiency or a bit more personality: the Kia Niro goes toe-to-toe with the Kia XCeed. One is all about hybrid thrift and everyday practicality; the other flirts with sharper styling and a livelier drive — both sensible …
Kia Niro
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Kia Niro and the Nissan Qashqai occupy similar compact crossover territory but take different approaches: the Niro emphasizes efficiency and clever interior packaging, while the Qashqai leans toward a more conventional SUV feel with sharper road manners. This short comparison outlines the key …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Kia Niro
Toyota C-HR
VS
Choosing between the Kia Niro and the Toyota C-HR comes down to whether you prioritize efficiency and practicality or bold styling and a sportier ride. This quick comparison highlights the Niro’s roomy, fuel-efficient approach versus the C-HR’s striking design and agile feel to help you pick the …
Kia Niro
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Kia Niro feels like the sensible crossover hero — roomy, composed and blessed with a polished hybrid system that trims fuel bills without stripping comfort. The Toyota Yaris Cross is smaller and cheekier, nailing city agility and frugal running costs, so pick the Niro for family practicality …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Niro
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Niro are two popular compact crossovers that appeal to buyers deciding between sportier looks and practical efficiency. Though they share similar underpinnings and offer hybrid and electric options, they differ in driving dynamics, interior space, and feature priorities — …
Kia Niro
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 - 111 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,474 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
451 L
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
466 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
138 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
265 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
102 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Kia
Brand
Nissan
What drive types are available for the Kia Niro?

The Kia Niro is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.