@ Kia Corporation

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

Kia Niro vs Nissan Juke – Differences & prices compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Kia Niro?

Up to 180 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What are the consumption figures for the Kia Niro in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 2.40 L.

Q: How large is the Kia Niro’s battery?

The battery capacity is 11.10 kWh.

Q: What maximum speed does the Kia Niro reach?

The Kia Niro reaches up to 185 km/h.

Q: What are the dimensions of the Kia Niro?

The Kia Niro measures 4420 mm long, 1825 mm wide and 1545 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Nissan Juke?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: How much power does the Nissan Juke deliver on the road?

The Nissan Juke reaches a peak output of 143 HP, depending on the model.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Nissan Juke according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.70 L.

Q: How large is the Nissan Juke’s battery?

The Nissan Juke comes with a 0.60 kWh battery.

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Nissan Juke?

scroll down

Niro @ Kia Corporation

The Compact SUV Showdown: Kia Niro vs. Nissan Juke

With the automotive world continually evolving, compact SUVs like the Kia Niro and Nissan Juke have captured the interest of consumers looking for versatility and efficiency. These two models blend advanced technologies with practical features, catering to diverse driving needs. Let's delve into a comparison of their design, performance, and innovations to see which one suits your lifestyle best.

Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Design and Dimensions

The Kia Niro and Nissan Juke both embrace the compact SUV framework, offering bold yet distinct styling. The Niro measures 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and stands 1545 mm tall, giving it a robust road presence. In contrast, the Juke is slightly shorter and taller with dimensions of 4210 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and a height of 1593 mm.

Both vehicles provide ample space with five doors and a seating capacity for five passengers. The Niro offers a slightly larger trunk capacity at 451 L, whereas the Juke follows closely with up to 422 L of storage space, making both suitable for weekend getaways and urban errands.

scroll down

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Engine and Performance

The Kia Niro offers a choice between Full Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid options, generating power from 129 HP to 171 HP. Driven with a Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission and Front-Wheel Drive, the Niro accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 10.4 seconds for the plug-in variant, and a top speed of 161 km/h. The vehicle's fuel consumption ranges from 4.4 L/100 km to a remarkable 0.8 L/100 km in its plug-in hybrid form, highlighting its focus on efficiency.

Nissan’s Juke comes with petrol and full hybrid options, offering horsepower between 114 HP to 143 HP. The Juke, also a Front-Wheel Drive, can transition from 0 to 100 km/h in around 10.1 seconds in its hybrid guise, achieving a top speed of 180 km/h. Fuel consumption varies from 4.7 L/100 km to 6 L/100 km depending on the option chosen.

Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Technological Innovations

Both vehicles are packed with modern innovations. The Kia Niro’s hybrids are equipped with either a 1.3 kWh or an impressive 11.1 kWh battery capacity, offering an electric range of up to 65 km. This makes the Niro an attractive option for those looking to reduce their carbon footprint, with CO2 emissions as low as 19 g/km.

The Nissan Juke’s hybrid model features a 0.6 kWh battery, providing a balanced performance while maintaining a lower CO2 output of 107 g/km. It's designed for those who crave nimbler urban driving and quick getaways with a more traditional automotive experience.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Interior Comfort and Features

Inside, both vehicles focus on driver and passenger comfort with a suite of features designed for convenience. Both models upholster their cabins with modern materials and incorporate technology that's easy to use while on the move, ensuring a connected and controlled driving experience.

The Kia Niro stands out with its efficiency-driven features, appealing to those environmentally conscious consumers, while the Juke brings a sporty edge to its design, enticing those who value spirited driving with a keen sense for style and technology.

Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Conclusion

Choosing between the Kia Niro and Nissan Juke ultimately comes down to preferences in efficiency, style, and technology. The Niro excels in sustainable driving with its hybrid technologies, while the Juke offers a sportier driving experience with innovative features. Both vehicles offer compelling packages for the modern driver, making either choice a worthwhile investment for those stepping into the compact SUV market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Juke has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £, while the Kia Niro costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 7749 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 2.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.70 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.

Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia Niro has a evident edge – offering 180 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia Niro is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 9.90 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.10 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia Niro performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Nissan Juke tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia Niro pulls evident stronger with 265 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm difference.

scroll down

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Nissan Juke is to a small extent lighter – 1274 kg compared to 1474 kg. The difference is around 200 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia Niro offers hardly perceptible more room – 451 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia Niro performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1445 L, which is about 140 L more than the Nissan Juke.

When it comes to payload, Kia Niro barely noticeable takes the win – 466 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Kia Niro proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Kia Niro is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £29,100

@ Kia Corporation

Kia Niro

Price : 29100 - 38600 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission : Automatic
Transmission Detail : Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 138 - 180 HP
Consumption L/100km : 2.4 - 4.9 L
Electric Range : 57 - 62 km
Battery Capacity : 1.3 - 11.1 kWh
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 9.9 - 11.4 s
Model Year : 2025
Max Speed : 170 - 185 km/h
Torque : 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 4
Doors : 5
Model : Niro
Modell : Niro 1.6 GDI HEV, Niro 1.6 GDI PHEV
CO2 Efficiency Class : C, B
Trim Level : Core DCT6, Vision DCT6, Spirit DCT6
Power kW : 102 - 132 kW
co2 : 53 - 111 g/km
Engine capacity : 1580 cm3
Curb weight : 1474 - 1594 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 37 - 42 L
Trunk capacity : 348 - 451 L
Length : 4420 mm
Width : 1825 mm
Height : 1545 mm
Brand : Kia
Max trunk capacity : 1342 - 1445 L
Payload : 466 kg

details

Kia Niro

5 (1)

The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.

details

@ Kia Corporation

@ Kia Corporation

@ Kia Corporation

@ Kia Corporation

@ Kia Corporation

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Juke

@ Opel / Stellantis Media

Opel Corsa

The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …

@ Kia Corporation

Kia Niro

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

Kia Niro plays the sensible card with roomy packaging, excellent hybrid economy and impressively low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more dynamic compact SUV that delivers sharper handling and a slightly more premium cabin. If you’re after thrift and family practicality go Niro; …

Kia Niro

Nissan Juke

@ Kia Corporation	@ Nissan Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price 29100 - 38600 £	Price 21400 - 30100 £
Consumption L/100km 2.4 - 4.9 L	Consumption L/100km 4.7 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 57 - 62 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 1.3 - 11.1 kWh	Battery Capacity 0.60 kWh
co2 53 - 111 g/km	co2 107 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 37 - 42 L	Fuel tank capacity 46 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1474 - 1594 kg	Curb weight 1274 - 1405 kg
Trunk capacity 348 - 451 L	Trunk capacity 354 - 422 L
Length 4420 mm	Length 4210 mm
Width 1825 mm	Width 1800 mm
Height 1545 mm	Height 1593 mm
Max trunk capacity 1342 - 1445 L	Max trunk capacity 1237 - 1305 L
Payload 466 kg	Payload 405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 138 - 180 HP	Power HP 114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 9.9 - 11.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed 170 - 185 km/h	Max Speed 166 - 180 km/h
Torque 265 Nm	Torque 200 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 102 - 132 kW	Power kW 84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity 1580 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1598 cm3