VS

Kia Niro vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (138 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Kia Niro vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Kia Niro

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Kia Niro is substantially cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 246,266 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Kia Niro uses 4.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 11.5 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers considerably more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 462 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 6.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers significantly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 635 Nm more.

Niro

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Niro is clearly lighter – 1,474 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 1,186 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers moderately more boot space – 555 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries substantially more – 840 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 374 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Kia Niro is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
Niro

Kia Niro

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 138 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
Kia Niro
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Kia Niro

The Kia Niro is a practical crossover that blends economy and everyday versatility without sacrificing comfort. With a roomy, well-laid-out cabin and calm, composed handling, it’s an easy-to-live-with choice for commuters and families.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Kia Niro
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 - 111 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,474 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
451 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
466 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
138 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
265 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
102 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Kia
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.