Compare performance (138 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Volvo EC40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Kia Niro is clearly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,400 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers significantly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 304 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 6.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers significantly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 405 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia Niro is clearly lighter – 1,474 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 591 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Kia Niro carries barely more – 466 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.
The Volvo EC40 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
detailsThe Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
|
Price
46,500 - 59,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,474 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Volvo
|