Compare performance (138 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 46600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Volvo EC40?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Kia Niro has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17486 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 has a convincingly edge – offering 442 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 304 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.10 s. That’s about 6.50 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EC40 pulls decisively stronger with 670 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 405 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia Niro is convincingly lighter – 1474 kg compared to 2065 kg. The difference is around 591 kg.
When it comes to payload, Kia Niro minimal takes the win – 466 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.
The Volvo EC40 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
detailsThe Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 33800 £
|
Price
46600 - 59000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1474 kg
|
Curb weight
2065 - 2185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4440 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1873 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1591 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1196 L
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.