VS

Kia Picanto vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (68 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (15,100 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Picanto or Renault Arkana?

Kia Picanto vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Kia Picanto

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Picanto

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Kia Picanto is substantially cheaper – starting at 15,100 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,380 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Kia Picanto with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Arkana offers significantly more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 68 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Arkana is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 10.8 s, while the Kia Picanto takes 14.6 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Arkana delivers considerably more torque with 205 Nm compared to 96 Nm. That’s about 109 Nm more.

Picanto

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Picanto is markedly lighter – 1,124 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 386 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries markedly more – 451 kg compared to 332 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Kia Picanto
Kia Stonic
VS
The Kia Picanto and Kia Stonic are closely related but aimed at different needs: the Picanto is a pint-sized city hatch built for nimble urban driving and low running costs, while the Stonic is a small crossover that adds higher seating, extra boot space and a more rugged presence. This comparison …
Kia Picanto
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Picanto

Kia Picanto is a cheeky city hatch that squeezes surprising style, practicality and a smile-inducing drive into a pocket-friendly package. It’s ideal for urban buyers who want fuss-free running, effortless parking and a car that punches above its class without pretending to be anything it’s not.

details
Kia_Picanto_GT_Line_MJ21_01
Kia_Picanto_GT_Line_MJ21_03
Kia Picanto X-Line_02
Kia_Picanto_MJ22_Innen_01

Reviews Kia Picanto

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Fiat Panda
Kia Picanto
VS
The Fiat Panda and Kia Picanto are two of Europe’s most sensible city cars, offering affordable running costs and easy maneuverability for urban life. The Panda emphasizes practicality and interior space with a rugged, no-nonsense character, while the Picanto delivers sharper handling, more modern …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana offers a more stylish coupe-SUV design, appealing to those looking for a distinctive aesthetic without …
Dacia Sandero
Kia Picanto
VS
Comparing the Dacia Sandero and the Kia Picanto: both are budget-friendly small cars but they appeal to different priorities — the Sandero emphasizes space and low running costs, while the Picanto focuses on compact agility and city-friendly maneuverability. If you need roomy practicality and …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR
VS
Renault Arkana and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Renault Arkana or the …
Kia Picanto
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Kia Picanto is a cheeky city sparrow: tiny, cheap to buy and park, and surprisingly fun to hustle through tight streets if you don’t need boot space or long‑distance refinement. The Toyota Yaris, meanwhile, feels grown‑up by comparison — roomier, safer and available as an economical hybrid, so …
Kia Picanto
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
15,100 - 19,500 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 134 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,124 - 1,131 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
255 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,595 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
253 - 332 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
68 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.6 - 17.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
96 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
50 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Kia
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Kia Picanto have?

The Kia Picanto is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.