VS

Renault Arkana vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Toyota C-HR?

Renault Arkana vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.

Toyota C-HR

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Arkana is barely cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 677 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers visibly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 80 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is barely lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 5 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries only slightly more – 451 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
C-HR

Toyota C-HR

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 223 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 66 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
The Toyota C‑HR is the flamboyant, coupe‑like crossover that trades rear-seat space for eye-catching design and a higher stance, while the Toyota Corolla is the dependable compact that serves up better packaging, comfort and efficient powertrains. If you want personality and city swagger, pick the …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like the posh roommate you suddenly inherited — plush cabin, hushed hybrid powertrain and a dashboard that whispers premium — while the Toyota C‑HR plays the affordable style rebel with quirky looks and surprisingly practical packaging. Choose the LBX for serene luxury and badge …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Toyota C-HR and Toyota Yaris showcase their distinct personalities in the subcompact segment. While the C-HR offers a bold design and a more spacious interior, the Yaris stands out with its nimbleness and fuel efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Prius
VS
The Toyota C-HR and Toyota Prius compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR stand out with their distinctive designs and hybrid options. While the Lexus UX offers a more premium interior and advanced technology features, the Toyota C-HR appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its sporty styling and …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Unsure whether the Toyota C-HR or the Toyota C-HR+ is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
CUPRA Formentor
Toyota C-HR
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Toyota C-HR offer distinct takes on the compact SUV segment, each appealing to different driving enthusiasts. The Formentor boasts a sporty design and performance-oriented features, making it ideal for those seeking a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Toyota …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
In the battle between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla Cross, both models showcase the brand's commitment to blending style with functionality. The C-HR stands out with its bold, coupe-like design and sportier driving dynamics, appealing to a younger audience. Meanwhile, the Corolla Cross …
Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
451 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Renault
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.