Is the Kia Stonic offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Stonic is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Kia Stonic's engine?

Up to 115 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Kia Stonic use?

On average, the Kia Stonic consumes 5.60 L.

How many liters of cargo space does the Kia Stonic offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 352 L fit inside.

What are the Kia Stonic’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Kia Stonic is 4165 mm long, 1760 mm wide and 1520 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?

The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-5's engine?

Up to 141 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-5 according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 7 L.

What is the top speed of the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on the model, top speed is 195 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on configuration, up to 583 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-5?

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4690 mm long, 1860 mm wide and 1695 mm high.

Kia Stonic vs Mazda CX-5 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Stonic

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Kia Stonic has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20100 £, while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30000 £. That’s a price difference of around 9866 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Stonic manages with 5.60 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 1.40 L per 100 km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-5 has a slightly edge – offering 141 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-5 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 10.50 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.70 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-5 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Kia Stonic tops out at 182 km/h. The difference is around 13 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-5 pulls somewhat stronger with 238 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 38 Nm difference.

Stonic

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Stonic is evident lighter – 1205 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 424 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers clearly perceptible more room – 583 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 231 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs decisively better – up to 2019 L, which is about 864 L more than the Kia Stonic.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-5 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-5 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Kia Stonic

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.5 (4 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-5

Mazda CX-60

VS

In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …

Hyundai Bayon

Kia Stonic

VS

In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic each offer unique appeal with their distinctive designs and performance characteristics. While the Bayon impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the Stonic stands out for its sporty handling and …

Costs and Consumption
Price 20100 - 26600 £	Price 30000 - 39500 £
Consumption L/100km 5.6 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 127 - 133 g/km	co2 157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 45 L	Fuel tank capacity 56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1205 - 1270 kg	Curb weight 1629 - 1671 kg
Trunk capacity 352 L	Trunk capacity 583 L
Length 4165 mm	Length 4690 mm
Width 1760 mm	Width 1860 mm
Height 1520 mm	Height 1695 mm
Max trunk capacity 1155 L	Max trunk capacity 2019 L
Payload 440 - 445 kg	Payload -

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 100 - 115 HP	Power HP 141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.7 - 12.1 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed 179 - 182 km/h	Max Speed 195 km/h
Torque 172 - 200 Nm	Torque 238 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 74 - 85 kW	Power kW 104 kW
Engine capacity 998 cm3	Engine capacity 2488 cm3