In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Kia Stonic showcases its sporty design and impressive tech features, making it a standout choice for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the SEAT Arona boasts agile handling and a versatile interior, appealing to those seeking a fun driving experience with practicality. Both models offer unique strengths, but the ultimate decision may hinge on personal preferences regarding style and functionality.
The burgeoning small SUV segment is teeming with models vying for consumer attention, but two stand out as front-runners: the Kia Stonic and the SEAT Arona. As we delve into this comparison, we’ll explore their technical specifications, innovations, and how they perform on the road, providing insights to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
When it comes to engine options, the Kia Stonic offers a range of petrol engines, including a petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV) variant, providing a blend of efficiency and performance. The available power outputs span from 79 HP to 100 HP, delivering torque ranging from 113 Nm to 172 Nm. The Stonic boasts a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 11.3 seconds for the more powerful engine, while it utilizes a front-wheel-drive layout and can be paired with either a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission.
In contrast, the SEAT Arona brings a more powerful engine lineup, with outputs reaching up to 150 HP. The Arona's acceleration to 100 km/h can be achieved in a sporty 8.4 seconds, showcasing its agility and responsiveness. It also features a front-wheel-drive system and offers both manual and automatic transmission choices. The torque figures on the Arona can go as high as 250 Nm, giving it a robust feel on the roads.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the Kia Stonic stands commendably with a consumption rate ranging between 5.5 to 5.8 L/100km, depending on the engine choice. Its CO2 emissions are between 125 and 132 g/km, placing it in the D efficiency class, which is competitive for the SUV category.
The SEAT Arona, on the other hand, slightly edges out with a fuel consumption of 5.4 to 5.6 L/100km, and its CO2 emissions vary from 122 to 128 g/km. Both vehicles are designed to be environmentally conscious yet still deliver an enjoyable driving experience.
Dimensionally, the Kia Stonic measures 4140 mm in length, 1760 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height, making it a compact SUV that is easy to maneuver in urban settings. The trunk capacity is a practical 352 liters, accommodating everyday cargo needs.
Conversely, the SEAT Arona is slightly larger at 4153 mm in length, 1780 mm in width, and 1537 mm in height, allowing for a more spacious interior. It offers a trunk capacity of 400 liters, providing additional room for luggage or shopping, a major plus for family outings or road trips.
Both the Kia Stonic and SEAT Arona emphasize comfort and modern vehicle connectivity. The Stonic features a user-friendly infotainment system, often praised for its straightforward design and smartphone integration capabilities. Interior quality is commendable, providing a comfortable experience for all five occupants.
The SEAT Arona also excels in interior technology, offering advanced infotainment systems with features such as a premium sound system and a digital cockpit. Additionally, it includes a host of active safety features and driver assistance technologies, enhancing overall safety and peace of mind while driving.
Choosing between the Kia Stonic and the SEAT Arona largely hinges on personal preference and specific needs. The Stonic appeals to those seeking a compact SUV with efficient engines and a straightforward approach to driving. Its appealing design and practical features make it a worthy contender.
On the other hand, the SEAT Arona positions itself as the sportier option, delivering greater power and agility, alongside slightly more interior space. With its robust engine options and superior technology features, the Arona presents a compelling case, especially for those who prioritize performance.
Ultimately, both SUVs offer unique strengths and innovations worthy of consideration, ensuring that buyers in this competitive segment have excellent choices to consider for their next vehicle.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 19300 - 25400
£
|
Price
about 18400 - 28900
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 5.8
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
125 - 132
g/km
|
co2
122 - 128
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
45
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1155 - 1260
kg
|
Curb weight
1188 - 1268
kg
|
Trunk capacity
352
L
|
Trunk capacity
400
L
|
Length
4140
mm
|
Length
4153
mm
|
Width
1760
mm
|
Width
1780
mm
|
Height
1505
mm
|
Height
1537
mm
|
Payload
445 - 455
kg
|
Payload
502 - 522
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Schaltgetriebe
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Schaltgetriebe, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
79 - 100
HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 14.2
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3
s
|
Max Speed
158 - 179
km/h
|
Max Speed
182 - 210
km/h
|
Torque
113 - 200
Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
58 - 74
kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1197
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Top speed
158 - 179
km/h
|
Top speed
182 - 210
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
SEAT
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.