Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Kia XCeed?

Up to 180 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Kia XCeed in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 6.40 L.

What are the Kia XCeed’s length, width and height?

Length 4395 mm, width 1826 mm, height 1483 mm – those are the dimensions of the Kia XCeed.

What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the MG ZS deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the MG ZS delivers up to 197 HP.

How much fuel does the MG ZS use?

On average, the MG ZS consumes 5 L.

What is the top speed of the MG ZS?

Depending on the model, top speed is 179 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the MG ZS?

The MG ZS measures 4430 mm long, 1818 mm wide and 1635 mm high.

Kia XCeed vs MG ZS - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £, while the Kia XCeed costs 23100 £. That’s a price difference of around 5143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG ZS manages with 5 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 1.40 L per 100 km.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a minimal edge – offering 197 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia XCeed is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 8.50 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.70 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia XCeed performs a bit better – reaching 210 km/h, while the MG ZS tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia XCeed pulls clearly stronger with 265 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm difference.

XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, MG ZS is barely noticeable lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1351 kg. The difference is around 21 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MG ZS offers barely noticeable more room – 443 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 17 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG ZS performs minimal better – up to 1457 L, which is about 79 L more than the Kia XCeed.

When it comes to payload, Kia XCeed slight takes the win – 479 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MG ZS proves to be performs better in key areas and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MG ZS is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Kia XCeed

4.8 (2 Reviews)

Reviews MG ZS

4.1 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

If you want a sharper, more practical hatchback that still feels engaging behind the wheel, the Kia Ceed is the sensible, better-value pick with crisper handling and lower running costs. But if you crave a bit of SUV swagger, higher ride height and extra street presence for town runs and weekend …

@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

MG ZS

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Qashqai

VS

In the competitive compact SUV market, the MG ZS and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their unique offerings and charm. The MG ZS delivers remarkable value with its robust features and spacious interior, appealing to budget-conscious buyers, while the Nissan Qashqai impresses with its refined driving …

Costs and Consumption
Price 23100 - 33000 £	Price 18000 - 24000 £
Consumption L/100km 6.4 - 6.8 L	Consumption L/100km 5 - 6.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 144 - 155 g/km	co2 113 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 L	Fuel tank capacity 41 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1351 - 1419 kg	Curb weight 1330 - 1420 kg
Trunk capacity 426 L	Trunk capacity 443 L
Length 4395 mm	Length 4430 mm
Width 1826 mm	Width 1818 mm
Height 1483 - 1495 mm	Height 1635 mm
Max trunk capacity 1378 L	Max trunk capacity 1457 L
Payload 471 - 479 kg	Payload 375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 115 - 180 HP	Power HP 116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.5 - 11.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed 182 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 168 - 179 km/h
Torque 200 - 265 Nm	Torque 148 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 85 - 132 kW	Power kW 85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity 998 - 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 1495 - 1498 cm3