VS

Kia XCeed vs Suzuki S-Cross – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Kia XCeed or Suzuki S-Cross?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XCeed @ press.kia.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki S-Cross has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21800 £, while the Kia XCeed costs 23100 £. That’s a price difference of around 1372 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki S-Cross manages with 5.10 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

S-Cross @ Suzuki

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia XCeed has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 180 HP compared to 129 HP. That’s roughly 51 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia XCeed is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 8.50 s, while the Suzuki S-Cross takes 9.50 s. That’s about 1 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia XCeed performs slight better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Suzuki S-Cross tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia XCeed pulls to a small extent stronger with 265 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.

XCeed @ press.kia.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is barely noticeable lighter – 1280 kg compared to 1351 kg. The difference is around 71 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers minimal more room – 430 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia XCeed performs somewhat better – up to 1378 L, which is about 148 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.

When it comes to payload, Kia XCeed to a small extent takes the win – 479 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 74 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Kia XCeed shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £23,100
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_25

Kia XCeed

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 180 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.4 - 6.8 L
details

Kia XCeed

The Kia XCeed offers a stylish and modern design, blending the sportiness of a coupé with the practicality of an SUV. Its interior is well-crafted, featuring high-quality materials and a range of advanced technology to enhance the driving experience. With an emphasis on comfort and efficiency, the XCeed provides a compelling option for those seeking a versatile and dynamic vehicle.

details
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_25 @ press.kia.com
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_08 @ press.kia.com
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_21 @ press.kia.com
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_57 @ press.kia.com

Suzuki S-Cross

4.5 (2)
rate

The Suzuki S-Cross emerges as a versatile crossover, blending urban agility with a rugged presence suited for diverse terrains. Its design combines sleek, modern aesthetics with practicality, offering a spacious interior that comfortably accommodates passengers and cargo for varied journeys. Drivers will appreciate the advanced technology features that enhance both driving pleasure and safety, making the S-Cross a well-rounded option for those seeking reliability and style in a compact SUV.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001 @ Suzuki
Suzuki_S-Cross_004 @ Suzuki
Suzuki_S-Cross_016 @ Suzuki
Suzuki_S-Cross_037 @ Suzuki
Suzuki_S-Cross_040 @ Suzuki
Suzuki_S-Cross_049 @ Suzuki
S-CROSS_innen2 @ Suzuki

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

Miroljub 6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Similar Comparisons

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Kia Stonic
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted drive, better refinement and room for weekend gear — at a slightly higher price.
Kia XCeed
Suzuki S-Cross
XCeed
S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
23100 - 33000 £
Price
21800 - 33700 £
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.8 L
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
144 - 155 g/km
co2
116 - 131 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1351 - 1419 kg
Curb weight
1280 - 1435 kg
Trunk capacity
426 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4300 mm
Width
1826 mm
Width
1785 mm
Height
1483 - 1495 mm
Height
1580 mm
Max trunk capacity
1378 L
Max trunk capacity
1230 L
Payload
471 - 479 kg
Payload
375 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automated Manual, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
Power HP
116 - 129 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 11.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.50 s
Max Speed
182 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 195 km/h
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
Power kW
85 - 95 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Kia
Brand
Suzuki

Similar Comparisons

Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you want a wallet-friendly, fun-to-drive runabout; choose the Corolla Cross if you prize space, long-term reliability and the kind of fuel economy that quietly keeps your running costs down.
Kia Ceed
Kia XCeed
VS
In the battle between the Kia Ceed and Kia XCeed, both models showcase the brand's commitment to quality and performance, yet cater to different driving preferences. The Ceed offers a sporty hatchback experience with agile handling, while the XCeed presents a more elevated crossover stance, blending versatility with distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between the two comes down to whether you prioritize dynamic driving or a more spacious, commanding position on the road.
Kia Niro
Kia XCeed
VS
In the battle of practicality and style, the Kia Niro and Kia XCeed stand out with their unique offerings. The Niro excels in fuel efficiency and eco-friendly technology, appealing to the environmentally conscious driver, while the XCeed boasts a sportier design and elevated driving position for those seeking a more dynamic experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two Kia models comes down to personal preference, with each catering to different lifestyle needs.
Honda HR-V
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Honda HR-V and Suzuki S-Cross stand out with their unique offerings. The HR-V impresses with its versatile interior and fuel-efficient performance, while the S-Cross boasts a more rugged design and off-road capability. Both vehicles cater to different lifestyle needs, making them top contenders for buyers seeking practicality without compromising style.
Renault Captur
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Suzuki S-Cross
Dacia Bigster
VS
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Vauxhall Frontera
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.