Compare performance (269 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (43,300 £ vs 38,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover Evoque or Audi Q3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Audi Q3 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,057 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q3 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 52 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers marginally more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers visibly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is very slightly lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 157 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers barely more boot space – 488 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 16 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries moderately more – 600 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.
The Audi Q3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
detailsThe Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
Audi
|