Compare performance (269 HP vs 326 HP), boot space and price (43,300 £ vs 38,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover Evoque or BMW X1?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
BMW X1 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 38,700 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,628 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X1 uses 2.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the BMW X1 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 81 km, about 14 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X1 offers somewhat more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X1 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers moderately more torque with 540 Nm compared to 477 Nm. That’s about 63 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW X1 is a bit lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 217 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW X1 offers slightly more boot space – 540 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 68 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries moderately more – 600 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.
The BMW X1 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
detailsThe BMW X1 delivers BMW's sporty driving character in a compact premium crossover package, making daily driving both engaging and practical. With a refined cabin, flexible cargo space and composed handling, it's a smart choice for buyers who want luxury and versatility without compromise.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
Price
38,700 - 56,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
67 km
|
Electric Range
81 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
co2
57 - 175 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
BMW
|