Is the Lexus LS offered with different drivetrains?

The Lexus LS is available as All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Lexus LS deliver on the road?

Up to 359 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Lexus LS use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 9.60 L.

How much luggage fits in the Lexus LS?

Depending on configuration, up to 430 L fit inside.

What are the Lexus LS’s length, width and height?

The Lexus LS measures 5235 mm long, 1900 mm wide and 1460 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 4 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 60 km.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

Lexus LS vs Mazda CX-80 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

LS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-80 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49300 £, while the Lexus LS costs 112300 £. That’s a price difference of around 62949 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 4 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Lexus LS with 9.60 L. The difference is about 5.60 L per 100 km.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Lexus LS has a slight edge – offering 359 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lexus LS is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.

LS

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers significantly more seating capacity – 7 vs 4.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is slightly lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2345 kg. The difference is around 214 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Lexus LS offers distinct more room – 430 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 172 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 distinct takes the win – 650 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 195 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Lexus LS

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-80

Toyota Highlander

VS

In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …

Mazda CX-80

Volvo XC90

VS

In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …

Costs and Consumption
Price 112300 - 131100 £	Price 49300 - 61400 £
Consumption L/100km 9.60 L	Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 60 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 216 g/km	co2 91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 82 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Sedan	Body Type SUV
Seats 4	Seats 7
Doors 4	Doors -
Curb weight 2345 kg	Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity 430 L	Trunk capacity 258 L
Length 5235 mm	Length -
Width 1900 mm	Width 1890 mm
Height 1460 mm	Height -
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity -
Payload 455 kg	Payload 649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 359 HP	Power HP 254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.50 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed 250 km/h	Max Speed -
Torque -	Torque 500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders 6	Number of Cylinders 4 - 6
Power kW 264 kW	Power kW 187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity 3456 cm3	Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3