VS

Lexus NX vs Mazda CX-30 – Which one offers the better deal?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Lexus NX or Mazda CX-30?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Lexus NX costs 46000 £. That’s a price difference of around 20794 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Lexus NX manages with 2.90 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 2.80 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lexus NX has a evident edge – offering 309 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 123 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lexus NX is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 2 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Lexus NX tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is noticeable lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1805 kg. The difference is around 350 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Lexus NX offers distinct more room – 545 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Lexus NX performs minimal better – up to 1436 L, which is about 30 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Lexus NX barely noticeable takes the win – 515 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Lexus NX shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £46,000
73893-2021nxdplnx350hdynamic003

Lexus NX

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 244 - 309 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.9 - 5.9 L
  • Electric Range : 72 km
details

Lexus NX

5 (1)
rate

The Lexus NX embodies a sophisticated blend of striking design and luxurious comfort, providing an exceptional driving experience. Its hybrid powertrain offers seamless performance, ensuring both efficiency and a smooth ride. Inside, high-quality materials and innovative technology create an atmosphere of modern elegance and convenience.

details
73893-2021nxdplnx350hdynamic003 @ toyota-media.de
73959-2021nxdplnx350hstatic004 @ toyota-media.de
73960-2021nxdplnx350hstatic001 @ toyota-media.de
73857-2021nxdplnx350hdetail002 @ toyota-media.de
73863-2021nxdplnx350hdetail008 @ toyota-media.de

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-30
NX
CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
46000 - 64300 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
72 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
65 - 134 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1805 - 2065 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
545 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4660 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1865 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1670 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1436 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
475 - 515 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
244 - 309 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 8.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
179 - 227 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
2487 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Lexus
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-30 showcases its premium interior and striking design, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and comfort. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Vitara stands out with its rugged versatility and off-road capabilities, making it a great choice for adventurous drivers. Ultimately, while both SUVs offer unique strengths, the decision will hinge on personal preferences regarding style versus practicality.
Lexus NX
Volvo XC40
VS
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Is the Lexus NX offered with different drivetrains?

The Lexus NX is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.