VS

Lynk & Co 01 vs MG ZS comparison

Compare performance (280 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (36,900 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lynk & Co 01 or MG ZS?

Lynk & Co 01 vs MG ZS: Key differences

Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

01

MG ZS vs Lynk & Co 01: SUV Showdown

In the rapidly evolving landscape of SUVs, two models stand out with their distinct approaches to performance, efficiency, and technology: the MG ZS and the Lynk & Co 01. Both offer a compelling mix of features and innovations, yet cater to different preferences and priorities. Here’s how they stack up against each other.

ZS

Efficiency and Performance: A Look Under the Hood

The MG ZS provides a versatile range of powertrains, including electric, full hybrid, and petrol engines. The electric variant boasts an impressive battery capacity of up to 65.7 kWh, delivering a range of 440 km, which is noteworthy in its class. The compact SUV exhibits power outputs ranging from 116 HP to 197 HP, with a maximum torque of 280 Nm, and can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 8.6 to 8.7 seconds.

In contrast, the Lynk & Co 01 utilizes a plugin hybrid system that generates between 261 HP to 276 HP and torque figures of between 425 and 535 Nm. It offers an electric-only range of 75 km, thanks to its 14.1 kWh battery, making it highly efficient with a consumption rate as low as 0.9 L/100 km in hybrid mode. Its dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures a smoother and more efficient driving experience with a top speed reaching up to 210 km/h and an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in 7.7 to 8 seconds.

01

Design, Space, and Comfort

On the exterior, the MG ZS measures between 4323 to 4430 mm in length, 1809 to 1818 mm in width, and 1635 to 1649 mm in height. With a trunk capacity between 443 and 448 liters, it offers ample space for everyday use, further complemented by its seating for five passengers.

The Lynk & Co 01 is slightly larger, measuring between 4541 to 4545 mm in length, 1857 to 1860 mm in width, and 1694 mm in height. It offers a slightly larger trunk capacity of 466 liters. The interior is marked by a modern design focus, comfortably seating five passengers.

ZS

Sustainability and Emissions

Both SUVs cater to environmentally conscious consumers but do so differently. The MG ZS can boast zero emissions in its fully electric variant. In contrast, the Lynk & Co 01, a plugin hybrid, achieves impressively low emissions, remaining below 24 g/km of CO2, thanks to its efficient hybrid setup.

01

Conclusion: Choosing Your Ideal SUV

The choice between the MG ZS and the Lynk & Co 01 hinges on your priorities. If you’re seeking a transition towards electric mobility, the MG ZS’s fully electric variant is appealing with its extensive range and zero emissions. Alternatively, the Lynk & Co 01 presents a balanced approach with its plugin hybrid system, providing both efficiency and potent performance.

Both models showcase the shift towards more sustainable automotive solutions while offering distinct features tailored to different consumer needs. Whether it’s the versatile efficiency of the MG ZS or the performance-oriented design of the Lynk & Co 01, each SUV brings its own strengths to the table.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

01

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS is considerably cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Lynk & Co 01 costs 36,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,861 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lynk & Co 01 uses 0.9 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 4.2 L/100km.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 offers noticeably more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 83 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 01 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.7 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Lynk & Co 01 delivers considerably more torque with 535 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 387 Nm more.

01

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is significantly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,935 kg. The difference is around 605 kg.

When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries moderately more – 470 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 01 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,900
01

Lynk & Co 01

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 75 km
details
Lynk & Co 01
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Lynk & Co 01

The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.

details
381453-front_side_view-936758-original-1615303870
381443-side_view-fe0530-original-1615303770
381451-front_interior-54cae9-original-1615303868

Reviews Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
Lee Burkitt
15 Mar 2026, 04:44:31

I have the 01 from 2022 and have had it for 2 years. It's been a lovely car to own and drive. I return from Spain to the UK twice a year in it and it's a pleasure to travel in. The only grip has been the infotainment system which has been buggy and slow. I had the software updated a few weeks ago at the Volvo garage as the over the air option does not work. This has made the infotainment system acceptable now.

It takes a while to get used to the seats for me as the base is quite hard but now I feel they are very confortable. I charge it everyday in the carpark and I use it 90% of the time on electric mode. It does the 70km on a full charge as stated and in petrol mode I'm getting around 16km a litre or 75 a gallon, the engine is only used on motorways.

Aftersales service is patchy here in Spain. My nearest dealer is about a 40 min drive from here, it's not like owning a Renault where there's a dealer everywhere, I've only had to take it there twice, once turned out to be a stone in a brake caliper causing a squeak and the other for the software update.

I highly recommend these cars!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
The verstegen
6 Jan 2026, 09:56:38

Top car.
Quality and price.
Great caravan tow vehicle.
A shame there's so much driving.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG ZS

The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
MG ZS
Opel Mokka
VS
When comparing the MG ZS and the Opel Mokka, both compact SUVs offer unique features catering to different preferences. The MG ZS stands out with its affordable price and spacious interior, making it a great choice for families. On the other hand, the Opel Mokka appeals with its sleek design, …
MG ZS
MG HS
VS
MG ZS and MG HS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Lynk & Co 01
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The Lynk & Co 01 and Lynk & Co 08 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
BYD Seal U
Lynk & Co 01
VS
In the increasingly competitive electric SUV market, the BYD Seal U and Lynk & Co 01 stand out as compelling choices for eco-conscious consumers. The Seal U offers a dynamic blend of range and performance, pairing stylish design with cutting-edge technology, while the Lynk & Co 01 impresses with …
Hyundai Kona
MG ZS
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold styling and tech-savvy interior, appealing to both young professionals and families alike. Meanwhile, the MG ZS offers excellent value with a spacious cabin and advanced safety features, making it a practical …
MG ZS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The MG ZS is the no-nonsense, value-packed compact SUV that gives you straightforward practicality and low running costs, while the MG MGS5 EV dials in electric refinement, sharper styling and longer range for drivers ready to swap petrol for a charging cable. If you want bang-for-buck, easy …
MG ZS
Opel Grandland
VS
MG ZS and Opel Grandland go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Lynk & Co 01
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,900 - 40,300 £
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Consumption L/100km
0.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
75 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
20 g/km
co2
115 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,935 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
415 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
280 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
535 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
206 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Lynk & Co
Brand
MG
Is the Lynk & Co 01 offered with different drivetrains?

The Lynk & Co 01 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.