VS

Lynk & Co 02 vs GWM ORA 05 comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 160 HP), boot space and price (30,900 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lynk & Co 02 or GWM ORA 05?

Lynk & Co 02 vs GWM ORA 05: Key differences

Lynk & Co 02

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

GWM ORA 05

  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

02

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

GWM ORA 05 is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Lynk & Co 02 costs 30,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,718 £.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 offers clearly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 160 HP. That’s roughly 112 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the GWM ORA 05 takes 9.3 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Lynk & Co 02 delivers moderately more torque with 323 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 53 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, GWM ORA 05 is clearly lighter – 1,560 kg compared to 1,895 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.

Looking at boot space, the GWM ORA 05 offers marginally more boot space – 422 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 12 L.

When it comes to payload, the Lynk & Co 02 carries barely more – 375 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 02 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,900
02

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 435 - 445 km
details

Frequently compared as well

ZEEKR X
Lynk & Co 02
VS
We’re squaring off the ZEEKR X against the Lynk & Co 02 to find which compact crossover delivers the best blend of design, tech and real-world usability. Expect sparks in the handling department from the ZEEKR and everyday cleverness from the 02 — the question is which one fits your driveway and …
Tesla Model 3
Lynk & Co 02
VS
The Tesla Model 3 and the Lynk & Co 02 are very different cars: the Model 3 is a minimalist, electric sedan built around efficiency and software-driven features, while the 02 is a compact, connectivity-focused crossover aimed at practicality and value. This comparison zeroes in on driving dynamics, …
Lynk & Co 02
GWM ORA 05

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Lynk & Co 02

The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.

details
serpimg_8xULuL

Reviews Lynk & Co 02

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

GWM ORA 05

The ORA 05 is a stylish electric hatch that mixes playful, modern styling with a well-finished cabin aimed at urban drivers. It delivers comfortable, composed city driving and sensible practicality, making it a compelling choice for buyers who want an easy-to-live-with, characterful EV.

details

Reviews GWM ORA 05

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Lynk & Co 02
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lynk & Co 02 and the Toyota C‑HR go head-to-head as compact crossovers that blend urban-friendly dimensions with bold styling. I'll compare the 02 and the Toyota C‑HR across design, driving feel, practicality and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
Lynk & Co 01
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Unsure whether the Lynk & Co 01 or the Lynk & Co 02 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
MG MG4
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Unsure whether the MG MG4 or the Lynk & Co 02 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Hyundai Kona
Lynk & Co 02
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Lynk & Co 02 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia EV3
Lynk & Co 02
VS
In the burgeoning market of electric vehicles, the Kia EV3 and Lynk & Co 02 offer compelling choices for eco-conscious consumers. The Kia EV3 impresses with its sleek design and commendable range, making it a practical option for those who prioritize efficiency without sacrificing style. …
Omoda 5
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the Lynk & Co 02 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Volvo EC40
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Volvo EC40 and Lynk & Co 02 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Volvo EX40
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Volvo EX40 and Lynk & Co 02 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Lynk & Co 02
GWM ORA 05

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,900 - 34,300 £
Price
23,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
158 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,895 kg
Curb weight
1,560 kg
Trunk capacity
410 L
Trunk capacity
422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,845 mm
Width
1,833 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 HP
Power HP
160 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
323 Nm
Torque
270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
200 kW
Power kW
118 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Lynk & Co
Brand
GWM
What drive types are available for the Lynk & Co 02?

The Lynk & Co 02 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.