VS

Lynk & Co 02 vs MG HS comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (30,900 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lynk & Co 02 or MG HS?

Lynk & Co 02 vs MG HS: Key differences

Lynk & Co 02

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

MG HS

4.6 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

02

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG HS is only slightly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Lynk & Co 02 costs 30,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 861 £.

As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 02 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 445 km, about 345 km more than the MG HS.

HS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

Both models deliver identical power – 272 HP each.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the MG HS takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG HS delivers barely more torque with 350 Nm compared to 323 Nm. That’s about 27 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG HS is marginally lighter – 1,735 kg compared to 1,895 kg. The difference is around 160 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MG HS offers somewhat more boot space – 507 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 97 L.

When it comes to payload, the MG HS carries marginally more – 400 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 02 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,900
02

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 435 - 445 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG HS
MG MGS9
VS
Choosing between the MG HS and the MG MGS9 comes down to whether you value compact practicality and efficiency or a larger, more upmarket presence and space. This quick comparison will focus on driving feel, interior room, technology and running costs to help you pick the best fit.
MG HS
Geely Starray
VS
The MG HS and Geely Starray are two value-focused compact SUVs that compete on style, tech and day-to-day practicality — the MG HS offers familiar SUV proportions and a straightforward package, while the Starray pushes a more modern, gadget-rich approach. This quick comparison will focus on driving …
Lynk & Co 02
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Lynk & Co 02

The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.

details
serpimg_8xULuL

Reviews Lynk & Co 02

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
LUIS
7 Jul 2026, 10:24:27

It's a very well-finished and aesthetically attractive car, very high-performing, but one in which the suspension doesn't match the performance delivered by its engine. In the Core version it has fairly restrained fuel consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG HS

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
Left-Front-45
Front-Side
Right-Back-45
Side-large-interior-1

Reviews MG HS

4.6 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ste
5 Jun 2026, 12:05:05

Hg: clearly the price, the equipment, the power, and of course the 7-year warranty, not just 3.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jose
3 Jun 2026, 15:41:56

Very competitive price
Very good and adequate finishes
Premium features
Extremely quiet

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
MG HS
VS
Put the Hyundai Tucson up against the MG HS and its plug‑in EHS sibling and you get a tasty choice: Korean refinement and all‑round polish versus MG's bargain-packed, tech-forward alternatives. We'll sort practicality, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can pick the SUV that actually …
MG HS
MG MGS6 EV
VS
Comparing the MG HS and the MG MGS6 EV lets you weigh a petrol-powered compact SUV against MG’s electric alternative. This quick guide highlights differences in driving feel, efficiency, interior space, tech and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your routine.
Nissan Qashqai
MG HS
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai and the MG HS helps you decide between a well-proven, refined compact SUV and a value-packed alternative with strong equipment levels. The Qashqai emphasises ride comfort, build quality and established resale while the MG HS offers more kit for the money, a generous …
ZEEKR X
Lynk & Co 02
VS
We’re squaring off the ZEEKR X against the Lynk & Co 02 to find which compact crossover delivers the best blend of design, tech and real-world usability. Expect sparks in the handling department from the ZEEKR and everyday cleverness from the 02 — the question is which one fits your driveway and …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG HS are popular compact SUVs that appeal to buyers after roomy cabins and practical everyday driving — the Kuga leans toward sharper handling and more refined powertrain options, while the MG HS focuses on strong value and generous standard kit. This comparison cuts through the …
Opel Grandland
MG HS
VS
The Vauxhall Grandland and the MG HS are both compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality and value, but they take different routes on ride refinement, interior quality and equipment. If you favour a more polished drive and a stronger dealer network, the Grandland is worth considering, …
Renault Symbioz
MG HS
VS
This comparison puts the Renault Symbioz and the MG HS head-to-head to help you see which suits your needs better. The Symbioz represents Renault’s forward-looking concept and tech vision, while the MG HS is a production compact SUV focused on practicality, value and everyday usability — I’ll …
MG ZS
MG HS
VS
The MG ZS and MG HS are closely related SUVs that target buyers seeking compact practicality and modern features without luxury-car prices. The ZS emphasises affordability and efficient urban use, while the HS offers more space, stronger engines and extra equipment, so your choice comes down to …
Lynk & Co 02
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,900 - 34,300 £
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
14 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,895 kg
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
Trunk capacity
410 L
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,845 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 HP
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
323 Nm
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
200 kW
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
Brand
Lynk & Co
Brand
MG
What drive types are available for the Lynk & Co 02?

The Lynk & Co 02 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.