VS

Mazda 2 Hybrid vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (116 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 2 Hybrid or Mazda CX-30?

Mazda 2 Hybrid vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Mazda 2 Hybrid

  • moderately cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • noticeably lighter
details

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (13 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Achim Sedelmaier
2 Hybrid

Mazda 2 Hybrid: Efficient Urban Explorer

The Mazda 2 Hybrid is a sleek, compact hatchback that's ideal for navigating urban landscapes. With its body type categorized as a hatchback, it perfectly blends style with functionality. The 2024 model has embraced the future with a full hybrid engine type, which signifies Mazda’s commitment to sustainable motoring without compromising performance.

Under the hood, this model offers a 116 HP power output from a three-cylinder, front-wheel-drive system, linked to a continuously variable transmission (CVT) for seamless gear shifting. The Mazda 2 Hybrid impresses with its exceptional fuel efficiency, boasting a fuel consumption of just 3.8 to 4 L/100km, making it an economical choice for everyday drivers. The 0-100 km/h acceleration time is a respectable 9.7 seconds, and it can reach a maximum speed of 175 km/h.

Inside, it comfortably seats five passengers, and despite its compact dimensions—measuring 3940 mm in length, 1745 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height—it offers a 286 L trunk capacity. As an environmentally friendly vehicle, its CO2 emissions range between 87 to 93 g/km, placing it in the B class for CO2 efficiency. The Mazda 2 Hybrid is a sensible choice for city dwellers who prioritize efficiency and eco-conscious driving.

CX-30

Mazda CX-30: Versatile and Robust Companion

The Mazda CX-30 stands out as a versatile SUV, offering a striking balance between urban practicality and off-road capability. Available with both manual and automatic transmission, this 2024 model allows for tailored driving preferences, with front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options for tackling varied terrains.

The CX-30 is offered with engine power options ranging up to 186 HP, thanks to its advanced petrol MHEV technology. Featuring a four-cylinder engine, this SUV demonstrates strong performance with a maximum speed range from 191 to 204 km/h, and 0-100 km/h acceleration times ranging between 8.3 to 10.3 seconds.

Despite its sporty prowess, the CX-30 remains practical, offering a fuel consumption range from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, which is commendable for an SUV of its size. The cargo space is generous, with trunk capacities ranging from 422 to 430 L, providing plenty of room for travel necessities. Dimensions measure at 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height, translating to a comfortable and spacious interior for up to five occupants.

Though CO2 emissions range between 129 to 148 g/km, resulting in a D to E efficiency class, the Mazda CX-30’s robust build and higher payload capacities (varying from 458 to 496 kg) make it a versatile vehicle suitable for a myriad of driving adventures.

2 Hybrid

Decision Time: Hatchback vs. SUV

Choosing between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Mazda CX-30 depends largely on your lifestyle needs. If you seek efficiency, compact size, and eco-friendliness, the Mazda 2 Hybrid is your perfect city companion. However, if you require versatility, more space, and a vehicle capable of tackling diverse environments, the Mazda CX-30 offers the functionality and performance you desire.

Both models reflect Mazda's innovative spirit, blending cutting-edge technology with design, making them stellar choices within their respective segments.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2 Hybrid

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda 2 Hybrid is moderately cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,428 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 2 Hybrid uses 3.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers noticeably more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 70 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Mazda 2 Hybrid takes 9.7 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

2 Hybrid

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 2 Hybrid is noticeably lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 275 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers visibly more boot space – 430 L compared to 286 L. That’s a difference of about 144 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries a bit more – 496 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details
Mazda 2 Hybrid
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 2 Hybrid

The Mazda 2 Hybrid brings Mazda’s trademark driving flair to the city, combining smooth, efficient running with unexpectedly eager handling that keeps short trips engaging. Compact, nicely finished and sensible on running costs, it’s a clever choice for buyers who want the economy of a small car without sacrificing cabin quality or personality.

details
2022_mazda2_barcelona_act_04_highres
2022_mazda2_barcelona_act_14_highres
2022_mazda2_barcelona_still_21_highres
2022_mazda2_barcelona_int_01_highres
2022_mazda2_barcelona_int_27_highres

Reviews Mazda 2 Hybrid

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (13 Reviews)
rate
Owners tend to be positive about the Mazda CX-30, often praising its quiet, well‑finished cabin, engaging driving feel and overall perceived value. Some owners mention strengths like refinement and build quality, while others call out drawbacks such as high cost for smaller engines, a tight fit for taller occupants, and mixed opinions on oversized wheel styling. These comments are relatively brief and somewhat mixed, so those negatives may not reflect every owner’s experience.
Jeroen
4 Sept 2026, 11:40:07

G engine based on much tried and tested predecessor

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
Mazda CX-30 vs Golf — two compact, sensible choices that target slightly different needs: the CX-30 brings SUV styling and a premium-feel cabin, while the Golf is the benchmark compact hatch for everyday practicality and versatility. Below I’ll run through the strengths and trade‑offs so you can …
Mazda 2 Hybrid
Toyota Aygo
VS
Choosing between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Toyota Aygo is essentially a choice between a refined, fuel-efficient small hatch and an ultra-compact city car focused on low running costs. I’ll compare economy, practicality, running costs and driving feel so you can see which one suits your everyday …
Mazda 2 Hybrid
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the city‑savvy duel between the Mazda2 Hybrid and the Toyota Yaris, the Mazda2 serves up sharper handling and a more premium interior, while the Yaris clings to its crown for frugal hybrid efficiency and bulletproof reliability. If you crave driving enjoyment and style, tip toward the Mazda2 …
Mazda CX-30
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda MX-30
VS
In the rapidly evolving world of crossover SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the Mazda MX-30 represent distinct approaches to modern driving needs, each with its unique charm. The CX-30 captivates with its robust yet refined design supported by a traditional internal combustion engine, focusing on …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda 2
Mazda 2 Hybrid
VS
Choosing between the Mazda 2 and the Mazda 2 Hybrid means weighing classic city-hatch simplicity against an electrified option that improves fuel economy and reduces emissions while keeping the same compact footprint. I’ll run through the key differences in drivetrain, running costs and everyday …
Mazda 2 Hybrid
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,300 - 28,300 £
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
87 - 93 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,180 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
286 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,745 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
435 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mazda
Is the Mazda 2 Hybrid offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda 2 Hybrid is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.