Compare performance (116 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 67,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 2 Hybrid or Polestar 3?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda 2 Hybrid is substantially cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Polestar 3 costs 67,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 45,351 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 3 offers clearly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 564 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mazda 2 Hybrid takes 9.7 s. That’s about 5.8 s quicker.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 2 Hybrid is significantly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 2,315 kg. The difference is around 1,135 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Polestar 3 offers clearly more boot space – 484 L compared to 286 L. That’s a difference of about 198 L.
When it comes to payload, the Polestar 3 carries clearly more – 645 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 210 kg.
The Polestar 3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid brings Mazda’s trademark driving flair to the city, combining smooth, efficient running with unexpectedly eager handling that keeps short trips engaging. Compact, nicely finished and sensible on running costs, it’s a clever choice for buyers who want the economy of a small car without sacrificing cabin quality or personality.
detailsPolestar 3 arrives as a Scandinavian-styled electric SUV that marries minimalist design with a statuesque presence, looking smarter than most in the car park. Inside, the cabin feels airy and thoughtful, with tech and driving manners that lean toward composed comfort rather than outright drama — perfect for buyers who want electric prestige without shouting about it.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,300 - 28,300 £
|
Price
67,600 - 91,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 20.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
601 - 647 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
87 - 93 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 kg
|
Curb weight
2,315 - 2,525 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
286 L
|
Trunk capacity
484 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,745 mm
|
Width
1,935 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Payload
605 - 645 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Polestar
|