VS

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Renault Captur comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (24,500 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Renault Captur?

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Renault Captur: Key differences

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • moderately more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Captur

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Hatchback

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Captur is slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 24,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,163 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

Captur

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers moderately more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Captur delivers marginally more torque with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.

3 Hatchback

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is only slightly lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 1,419 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Captur offers a bit more boot space – 422 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 71 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Hatchback carries barely more – 485 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Captur is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
Captur

Renault Captur

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L/100km
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Renault Captur

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details

Renault Captur

The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.

details
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Renault Captur

Costs and Consumption

Price
24,500 - 35,500 £
Price
21,400 - 28,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 146 g/km
co2
100 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,419 - 1,549 kg
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
Trunk capacity
351 L
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
470 - 485 kg
Payload
447 - 453 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.