VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Renault Captur – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Sedan or Renault Captur?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Captur has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20100 £, while the Mazda 3 Sedan costs 25000 £. That’s a price difference of around 4843 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Captur manages with 4.50 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.50 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Sedan is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.50 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Sedan performs a bit better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Renault Captur tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Captur pulls a bit stronger with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Renault Captur is barely noticeable lighter – 1293 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 127 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers barely noticeable more room – 450 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Sedan hardly perceptible takes the win – 481 kg compared to 457 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda 3 Sedan proves to be only a minor advantage and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda 3 Sedan is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,000

Mazda 3 Sedan

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.1 L
details

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan stands out with its elegant and sleek design, capturing attention on the road with its refined aesthetics. Inside, it offers a well-crafted and comfortable cabin, providing a pleasurable driving experience marked by quality materials and advanced features. The car's performance is reliable and smooth, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and long-distance journeys.

details

Renault Captur

5 (1)
rate

The Renault Captur is a compact SUV that combines stylish design with practical functionality, making it a popular choice for urban drivers. Its interior offers a versatile and comfortable space, featuring high-quality materials and modern technology. On the road, the Captur delivers a smooth and efficient driving experience, perfect for both city commutes and weekend adventures.

details
r210470p @ renault-presse.de
r210480p @ renault-presse.de
r210476p @ renault-presse.de
r210485p @ renault-presse.de

Similar Comparisons

Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Captur is the practical, pocket-sized crossover that balances frugal running costs, clever packaging and everyday comfort — the sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. By contrast the Renault Symbioz is a bold electric concept, part living room, part lab car, dazzling with future tech but offering little to the average shopper beyond inspiration (and excellent Instagram fodder).
Renault Captur
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Renault Captur and Toyota Yaris Cross stand out for their unique approaches to style and functionality. The Captur boasts a bold design and a customizable interior, making it an appealing choice for those seeking a vibrant urban lifestyle. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross combines Toyota's renowned reliability with impressive hybrid technology, providing a practical yet stylish option for environmentally-conscious drivers.
Mazda 3 Sedan
Renault Captur
Captur

Costs and Consumption
Price
25000 - 34200 £
Price
20100 - 28300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
123 - 135 g/km
co2
102 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
1420 - 1492 kg
Curb weight
1293 - 1514 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Length
4660 mm
Length
4239 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1797 mm
Height
1440 mm
Height
1575 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1276 - 1363 L
Payload
467 - 481 kg
Payload
376 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14.3 s
Max Speed
203 - 216 km/h
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

Dacia Sandero
Renault Captur
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Dacia Sandero offers remarkable value with its spacious interior and budget-friendly pricing, making it a top choice for practical buyers. Meanwhile, the Renault Captur stands out with its stylish design and higher-end features, appealing to those seeking a more premium crossover experience. Ultimately, the decision between these two models hinges on whether consumers prioritize affordability or a touch of sophistication in their everyday drives.
Renault Captur
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Citroen C3
Renault Captur
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Citroen C3 and Renault Captur both offer distinctive styles and practical features, catering to urban drivers. The Citroen C3 shines with its bold design and customizable options, making it a fun choice for those who value personalization. Meanwhile, the Renault Captur stands out with its versatile interior space and advanced technology, appealing to drivers seeking a blend of functionality and modern connectivity.
Vauxhall Mokka
Renault Captur
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Opel Mokka and Renault Captur both stand out with their striking designs and modern features. The Mokka offers a sportier driving experience and a more tech-focused interior, while the Captur impresses with its practicality and customizable options. Ultimately, choosing between these two stylish contenders comes down to personal preference in design aesthetics and driving dynamics.
Ford Puma
Renault Captur
VS
In the subcompact SUV segment, the Ford Puma and Renault Captur both bring distinct personalities to the driving experience. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty dynamics and crisp handling, appealing to those who prioritize an engaging drive. In contrast, the Renault Captur offers a more refined ride with its focus on comfort and customization, making it a strong choice for those who value versatility and style.
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
In the ever-popular Renault Captur versus Renault Clio showdown, drivers can expect distinct advantages in both compact versatility and sporty handling. The Captur shines with its higher driving position and spacious interior, making it ideal for urban adventures and family outings. Meanwhile, the Clio impresses with its agile performance and stylish design, catering to those who prioritize a dynamic driving experience.
Renault Captur
Renault Mégane
VS
In the world of compact French automobiles, the Renault Captur and Renault Mégane stand out with their distinct appeals. The Captur, with its elevated ride height and crossover styling, offers a youthful and versatile option for urban adventurers, featuring a spacious cabin and a host of customizable options. Meanwhile, the Mégane impresses with its refined handling and sleek design, ideal for those prioritizing performance and comfort in a compact hatchback.
Fiat 600
Renault Captur
VS
The Fiat 600, renowned for its compact dimensions and urban-friendly design, offers a unique retro charm with modern technology to appeal to city dwellers. In contrast, the Renault Captur stands out in the subcompact SUV category with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it an excellent choice for those who need versatility and practicality. Both vehicles cater to different lifestyles, with the Fiat 600 being ideal for style-conscious urbanites and the Renault Captur capturing the attention of families seeking comfort and space.
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.