What drive types are available for the Mazda 6 Estate?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda 6 Estate?

Depending on the version, the Mazda 6 Estate delivers up to 194 HP.

How much fuel does the Mazda 6 Estate use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.80 L.

How big is the Mazda 6 Estate overall?

The Mazda 6 Estate measures 4805 mm long, 1840 mm wide and 1480 mm high.

Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Nissan Qashqai deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the Nissan Qashqai delivers up to 205 HP.

How much fuel does the Nissan Qashqai use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.50 L.

How big is the Nissan Qashqai overall?

Length 4425 mm, width 1835 mm, height 1625 mm – those are the dimensions of the Nissan Qashqai.

Mazda 6 Estate vs Nissan Qashqai - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

6 Estate @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Qashqai has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29600 £, while the Mazda 6 Estate costs 30000 £. That’s a price difference of around 395 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda 6 Estate with 6.80 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a minimal edge – offering 205 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 11 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Mazda 6 Estate takes 8.10 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda 6 Estate performs minimal better – reaching 223 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 17 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls evident stronger with 330 Nm compared to 258 Nm. That’s about 72 Nm difference.

6 Estate @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is barely noticeable lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1475 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda 6 Estate offers hardly perceptible more room – 522 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda 6 Estate performs slightly better – up to 1664 L, which is about 217 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.

When it comes to payload, Mazda 6 Estate hardly perceptible takes the win – 571 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Nissan Qashqai proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Nissan Qashqai is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda 6 Estate

Reviews Nissan Qashqai

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Qashqai

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

VS

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Costs and Consumption
Price 30000 - 43500 £	Price 29600 - 39900 £
Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 7.6 L	Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 6.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 155 - 172 g/km	co2 102 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 62 L	Fuel tank capacity 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Estate	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1475 - 1598 kg	Curb weight 1420 - 1665 kg
Trunk capacity 522 L	Trunk capacity 479 - 504 L
Length 4805 mm	Length 4425 mm
Width 1840 mm	Width 1835 mm
Height 1480 mm	Height 1625 mm
Max trunk capacity 1664 L	Max trunk capacity 1422 - 1447 L
Payload 483 - 571 kg	Payload 466 - 520 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 145 - 194 HP	Power HP 140 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 10.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 10.2 s
Max Speed 205 - 223 km/h	Max Speed 170 - 206 km/h
Torque 213 - 258 Nm	Torque 240 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 107 - 143 kW	Power kW 103 - 151 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 1332 - 1498 cm3