VS

Mazda 6 Saloon vs Volvo EC40 comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (38,500 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 6 Saloon or Volvo EC40?

Mazda 6 Saloon vs Volvo EC40: Key differences

Mazda 6 Saloon

  • visibly cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

6 Saloon

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda 6 Saloon is visibly cheaper – starting at 38,500 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,049 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EC40 is marginally more efficient: consuming 16.2 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the Mazda 6 Saloon. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 33 km more than the Mazda 6 Saloon.

EC40

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers considerably more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 184 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mazda 6 Saloon takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers clearly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 350 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 6 Saloon is barely lighter – 2,027 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 38 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo EC40 offers a bit more boot space – 404 L compared to 336 L. That’s a difference of about 68 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EC40 carries slightly more – 435 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EC40 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,500
EC40

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 486 - 585 km
Mazda 6 Saloon
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda 6 Saloon

The Mazda6 saloon feels like the sensible yet stylish choice for buyers who want a car that drives with poise and looks sharper than its badge suggests. It mixes engaging handling, a refined cabin and everyday practicality without shouting for attention — perfect for those who prefer understated class with a wink.

details

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
Mazda 6 Saloon
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,500 - 41,600 £
Price
46,500 - 59,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
479 - 552 km
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,027 - 2,028 kg
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Trunk capacity
336 L
Trunk capacity
404 L
Length
4,921 mm
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,873 mm
Height
1,491 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,074 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 360 kg
Payload
395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
245 - 258 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
175 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
180 - 190 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.