Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo EC40 comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Volvo EC40?
Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo EC40: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Enyaq is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,686 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is marginally more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 1.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 4 km more than the Volvo EC40.
EC40
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers clearly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers very slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EC40 is very slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 9 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more boot space – 585 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 181 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries slightly more – 526 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,800
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EC40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
details
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EC40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.