VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Citroen C3 Aircross comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 145 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 16,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Citroen C3 Aircross?

Mazda CX-30 vs Citroen C3 Aircross: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

Citroen C3 Aircross

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • moderately lighter
  • barely more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Citroen C3 Aircross is significantly cheaper – starting at 16,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,043 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C3 Aircross uses 5.3 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

C3 Aircross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers noticeably more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Citroen C3 Aircross takes 12.3 s. That’s about 4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers marginally more torque with 240 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 Aircross is moderately lighter – 1,312 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 143 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen C3 Aircross offers barely more boot space – 460 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries barely more – 496 kg compared to 462 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen C3 Aircross sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £16,200
C3 Aircross

Citroen C3 Aircross

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 101 - 145 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.1 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 303 - 400 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3 Aircross
Opel Frontera
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Citroen C3 Aircross showcases its compact versatility and modern styling, appealing to urban drivers seeking practicality without compromising on flair. On the other hand, the Opel Frontera offers rugged capability and a robust design, perfect for those craving …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Citroen C3 Aircross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Citroen C3 Aircross

The Citroën C3 Aircross is a cheeky compact SUV that trades bland conformity for playful French character and clever practicality, ideal if you want a car with personality. It soaks up city life with a comfortable ride, inventive cabin tricks and a look that turns heads without asking for attention.

details
cl22010004-62d84cb377731
cl22010002-62d84ccb93b32
cl22010003-62d84cbdece69
c3_aircross_rip_curl_innen_1-62d84d1640e18

Reviews Citroen C3 Aircross

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Citroen C3
Citroen C3 Aircross
VS
The Citroën C3 is a cheeky, city-friendly hatch that’s easy to park, light on fuel and happy to nip through tight streets, while the Citroën C3 Aircross trades some of that nimbleness for SUV hauteur, extra interior space and a much more practical boot. Choose the C3 for pure urban agility and …
Citroen C3 Aircross
Peugeot 2008
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Citroën C3 Aircross and Peugeot 2008 go head-to-head with distinctive strengths. The Citroën C3 Aircross capitalizes on its unique, quirky design and spacious interior, making it an attractive option for families seeking comfort and practicality. …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Citroen C3 Aircross
Renault Captur
VS
The Citroën C3 Aircross and Renault Captur both stand out in the competitive compact SUV segment, each offering distinctive strengths for urban drivers. The C3 Aircross is praised for its spacious interior and quirky design, ideal for those who prioritize comfort and a unique aesthetic. Meanwhile, …
Citroen C3 Aircross
Citroen C4
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Citroën C3 Aircross and Citroën C4 offer distinct advantages catering to diverse driving needs. The C3 Aircross, with its compact SUV design, provides a higher driving position and greater versatility, ideal for urban adventures or family outings. Conversely, the …
Mazda CX-30
Citroen C3 Aircross

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
16,200 - 28,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
303 - 400 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 134 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,312 - 1,608 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
460 L
Length
-
Length
4,395 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
1,640 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,600 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
407 - 462 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
101 - 145 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 13 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
143 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
74 - 107 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Citroen
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.