VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Mercedes GLA comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 421 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 38,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Mercedes GLA?

Mazda CX-30 vs Mercedes GLA: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • only slightly lighter

Mercedes GLA

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-30

The Compact SUV Showdown: Mazda CX-30 vs. Mercedes GLA

With the evolving landscape of compact SUVs, two contenders have emerged as favorites among automotive enthusiasts: the Mazda CX-30 and the Mercedes GLA. Both models are renowned for their unique blend of style, innovation, and performance. In this article, we'll delve deeper into the specific technical aspects and innovations these vehicles bring to the table, helping you decide which might be your next ride.

GLA

Power and Performance

The 2024 Mazda CX-30 offers a robust range of engine choices, primarily focusing on petrol mild hybrid technology. Customers have the option of front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive configurations. With power outputs ranging from 140 to 186 horsepower and torque about 240 Nm, the CX-30 can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds. Its maximum speed varies between 191 and 204 km/h, ensuring a spirited drive no matter the environment.

The Mercedes GLA meanwhile offers a broader power spectrum, with horsepower ranging from 116 up to a staggering 421 HP, thanks to its variety of engines including petrol, diesel, plugin hybrid, and standard petrol versions. Accelerating from 0-100 km/h could be achieved in a swift 4.3 seconds in its upper trims. While the dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures seamless gear changes, the higher-end models offer an exhilarating top speed of up to 270 km/h.

CX-30

Efficiency and Sustainability

Both SUVs exhibit commendable efficiency, though the Mazda CX-30 is slightly more frugal with average consumption figures between 5.7 and 6.6 liters per 100km. Its CO2 emission varies between 129 and 148 g/km, placing it within the D and E efficiency classes.

The Mercedes GLA presents a wider efficiency band, courtesy of its multi-engine offerings. While its plugin hybrid models boast a consumption as low as 1.1 L/100km and an electric range up to 74 km, other variants consume anywhere from 5.4 to 9.5 L/100km. Consequently, its CO2 emissions can span from an impressive 23 g/km to a higher 216 g/km.

GLA

Interior and Practicality

For those prioritizing interior space and practicality, both the CX-30 and GLA comfortably seat five passengers, but some subtle differences might sway your choice. The CX-30 provides trunk space ranging from 422 to 430 liters, slightly surpassing the GLA's 385 to 435 liters depending on the model.

CX-30

Dimensions and Design

The CX-30 stands at 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height, which enhances its maneuverability and adds to its sleek design. On the other hand, the Mercedes GLA is marginally larger, with lengths ranging from 4412 to 4443 mm, and wider body measurements up to 1849 mm, which may appeal to those desiring a more commanding road presence.

GLA

Conclusion

Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and the Mercedes GLA boils down to individual preferences and needs. While the CX-30 offers a reliable and efficient option with a balance of performance and practicality, the GLA shines with its expansive range and luxurious edge. For those prioritizing advanced hybrid technology and a more varied power range, the Mercedes GLA would be an enticing choice. Those seeking fuel efficiency, modest elegance, and dependability will find a steadfast companion in the Mazda CX-30. Ultimately, both models represent the pinnacle of compact SUV innovation in their respective rights.

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes B Class
Mercedes GLA
VS
The Mercedes B‑Class is the practical, airy people‑carrier that prioritises space and comfort, while the Mercedes GLA takes the same mechanical smarts and adds SUV looks, higher ride height and a touch more road presence. Pick the B‑Class for family‑friendly sense and efficiency, choose the GLA if …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Mercedes GLA costs 38,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,602 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes GLA uses 2.9 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.

GLA

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLA offers considerably more power – delivering 421 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 235 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLA is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLA delivers clearly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is only slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,570 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLA offers very slightly more boot space – 435 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes GLA carries marginally more – 500 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLA is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,800
GLA

Mercedes GLA

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 421 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.9 - 9.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 km
details
Mazda CX-30
Mercedes GLA

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes GLA

The Mercedes GLA blends Mercedes style with compact crossover practicality, looking sharper than its size suggests while still feeling purposeful around town. Inside it serves up premium materials and tech-forward ergonomics, and the composed ride makes it an appealing pick for buyers who want luxury wrapped in a city-friendly package with a wink of adventurous spirit.

details
20C0047_067
20C0047_071
20C0047_104
20C0047_115

Reviews Mercedes GLA

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Gutter
24 Feb 2026, 21:53:27

Super nimble, very impressive power from this 1,300cc mild‑hybrid engine — in town, on the road and on the motorway for this 2025 GLA 180 Style AMG... premium interior!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Serge
16 Jan 2026, 16:09:11

You have to compare like with like — the GLA should be compared to the Q3, not the Q2 as in your study!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mercedes A Class
Mercedes GLA
VS
The Mercedes A‑Class is the sharper, more driver-focused hatch that feels nimble and refined on twisty roads, while the Mercedes GLA trades a bit of agility for SUV practicality with a higher ride height, extra luggage space and a commanding view of the road. Pick the A‑Class for sporty handling, …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
BMW X2
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the BMW X2 and Mercedes GLA stand out with their stylish designs and engaging performance. While the X2 offers a sportier driving experience with sharp handling and a distinctive coupe-like silhouette, the GLA impresses with its elegant interior and advanced …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Audi Q2
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 stands out with its youthful design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. Meanwhile, the Mercedes GLA offers a more luxurious experience with its refined interior and advanced technology features, …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-30
Mercedes GLA

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
38,800 - 75,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 9.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
12.9 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
66 - 216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,570 - 1,810 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
385 - 435 L
Length
-
Length
4,412 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,834 - 1,849 mm
Height
-
Height
1,616 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,385 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
480 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
116 - 421 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
210 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
230 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
85 - 310 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,991 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.