VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Mercedes GLA - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (186 HP vs 421 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 38800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Mercedes GLA?

CX-30

The Compact SUV Showdown: Mazda CX-30 vs. Mercedes GLA

With the evolving landscape of compact SUVs, two contenders have emerged as favorites among automotive enthusiasts: the Mazda CX-30 and the Mercedes GLA. Both models are renowned for their unique blend of style, innovation, and performance. In this article, we'll delve deeper into the specific technical aspects and innovations these vehicles bring to the table, helping you decide which might be your next ride.

GLA

Power and Performance

The 2024 Mazda CX-30 offers a robust range of engine choices, primarily focusing on petrol mild hybrid technology. Customers have the option of front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive configurations. With power outputs ranging from 140 to 186 horsepower and torque about 240 Nm, the CX-30 can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds. Its maximum speed varies between 191 and 204 km/h, ensuring a spirited drive no matter the environment.

The Mercedes GLA meanwhile offers a broader power spectrum, with horsepower ranging from 116 up to a staggering 421 HP, thanks to its variety of engines including petrol, diesel, plugin hybrid, and standard petrol versions. Accelerating from 0-100 km/h could be achieved in a swift 4.3 seconds in its upper trims. While the dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures seamless gear changes, the higher-end models offer an exhilarating top speed of up to 270 km/h.

CX-30

Efficiency and Sustainability

Both SUVs exhibit commendable efficiency, though the Mazda CX-30 is slightly more frugal with average consumption figures between 5.7 and 6.6 liters per 100km. Its CO2 emission varies between 129 and 148 g/km, placing it within the D and E efficiency classes.

The Mercedes GLA presents a wider efficiency band, courtesy of its multi-engine offerings. While its plugin hybrid models boast a consumption as low as 1.1 L/100km and an electric range up to 74 km, other variants consume anywhere from 5.4 to 9.5 L/100km. Consequently, its CO2 emissions can span from an impressive 23 g/km to a higher 216 g/km.

GLA

Interior and Practicality

For those prioritizing interior space and practicality, both the CX-30 and GLA comfortably seat five passengers, but some subtle differences might sway your choice. The CX-30 provides trunk space ranging from 422 to 430 liters, slightly surpassing the GLA's 385 to 435 liters depending on the model.

CX-30

Dimensions and Design

The CX-30 stands at 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height, which enhances its maneuverability and adds to its sleek design. On the other hand, the Mercedes GLA is marginally larger, with lengths ranging from 4412 to 4443 mm, and wider body measurements up to 1849 mm, which may appeal to those desiring a more commanding road presence.

GLA

Conclusion

Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and the Mercedes GLA boils down to individual preferences and needs. While the CX-30 offers a reliable and efficient option with a balance of performance and practicality, the GLA shines with its expansive range and luxurious edge. For those prioritizing advanced hybrid technology and a more varied power range, the Mercedes GLA would be an enticing choice. Those seeking fuel efficiency, modest elegance, and dependability will find a steadfast companion in the Mazda CX-30. Ultimately, both models represent the pinnacle of compact SUV innovation in their respective rights.

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Mercedes GLA

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Mercedes GLA costs 38800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13602 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mercedes GLA manages with 2.90 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 2.80 L per 100 km.

GLA

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLA has a convincingly edge – offering 421 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 235 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLA is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.30 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 4 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes GLA pulls convincingly stronger with 500 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1570 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mercedes GLA offers barely noticeable more room – 435 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes GLA slight takes the win – 500 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLA is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-30
Mercedes GLA

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £38,800
GLA

Mercedes GLA

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 421 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.9 - 9.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 km
details

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Mercedes GLA

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Mercedes GLA blends Mercedes style with compact crossover practicality, looking sharper than its size suggests while still feeling purposeful around town. Inside it serves up premium materials and tech-forward ergonomics, and the composed ride makes it an appealing pick for buyers who want luxury wrapped in a city-friendly package with a wink of adventurous spirit.

details
20C0047_067
20C0047_071
20C0047_104
20C0047_115

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Mercedes GLA

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mercedes B Class
Mercedes GLA
VS
The Mercedes B‑Class is the practical, airy people‑carrier that prioritises space and comfort, while the Mercedes GLA takes the same mechanical smarts and adds SUV looks, higher ride height and a touch more road presence. Pick the B‑Class for family‑friendly sense and efficiency, choose the GLA if …
Mazda CX-30
Mercedes GLA

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
38800 - 75300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 9.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
12.90 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
66 - 216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1570 - 1810 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
385 - 435 L
Length
-
Length
4412 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1834 - 1849 mm
Height
-
Height
1616 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1385 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
480 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
116 - 421 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
210 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
230 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
85 - 310 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1332 - 1991 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel …
Mercedes A Class
Mercedes GLA
VS
Mercedes A Class and Mercedes GLA go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
Lexus LBX
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the realm of premium compact SUVs, the Lexus LBX and Mercedes GLA both deliver a blend of luxury and performance that caters to discerning buyers. While the LBX emphasizes a smooth and refined ride with its hybrid powertrain, the GLA offers a sportier edge and more dynamic handling. Ultimately, …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Honda Civic
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Honda Civic and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.