What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-30's engine?

The Mazda CX-30 reaches a peak output of 186 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-30 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.70 L.

What drivetrain options does the MG HS/EHS have?

The MG HS/EHS is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the MG HS/EHS's engine?

Up to 272 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the MG HS/EHS in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 0.50 L.

What is the MG HS/EHS’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 100 km.

What are the dimensions of the MG HS/EHS?

Overall, the MG HS/EHS is 4655 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1664 mm high.

Mazda CX-30 vs MG HS/EHS - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG HS/EHS has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 1243 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS/EHS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 5.20 L per 100 km.

HS/EHS

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS/EHS has a noticeable edge – offering 272 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 86 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS/EHS is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: MG HS/EHS pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 350 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm difference.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is to a small extent lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1625 kg. The difference is around 170 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MG HS/EHS offers a bit more room – 507 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 77 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 slightly takes the win – 496 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MG HS/EHS proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MG HS/EHS is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews MG HS/EHS

5 (1 Reviews)

Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma

Mazda CX-30

VS

In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …

Mazda CX-30

Skoda Kamiq

VS

The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …

Costs and Consumption
Price 25200 - 36800 £	Price 24000 - 36000 £
Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L	Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 100 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 129 - 148 g/km	co2 14 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors 5
Curb weight 1455 - 1587 kg	Curb weight 1625 - 1930 kg
Trunk capacity 422 - 430 L	Trunk capacity 441 - 507 L
Length -	Length 4655 - 4670 mm
Width 1795 mm	Width 1890 mm
Height -	Height 1663 - 1664 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1291 - 1484 L
Payload 458 - 496 kg	Payload 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 186 HP	Power HP 170 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 10.3 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 9.6 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed 190 - 195 km/h
Torque 238 - 240 Nm	Torque 275 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 103 - 137 kW	Power kW 125 - 200 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 1496 cm3