VS

Mazda CX-30 vs MG HS/EHS – Differences & prices compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-30 or MG HS/EHS fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG HS/EHS has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 1243 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS/EHS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 5.20 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS/EHS has a noticeable edge – offering 272 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 86 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS/EHS is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs minimal better – reaching 204 km/h, while the MG HS/EHS tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 9 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: MG HS/EHS pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 350 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is to a small extent lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1625 kg. The difference is around 170 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MG HS/EHS offers a bit more room – 507 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 77 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG HS/EHS performs barely noticeable better – up to 1484 L, which is about 78 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 slightly takes the win – 496 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MG HS/EHS proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MG HS/EHS is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,000

MG HS/EHS

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 7.6 L
  • Electric Range : 100 km
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

MG HS/EHS

5 (1)
rate

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details

Reviews MG HS/EHS

Mac Finn 29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Skoda Kamiq, buyers are treated to two distinct takes on the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the Kamiq stands out for its practicality and space efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both offer a compelling blend of style and functionality.
MG HS/EHS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
In the burgeoning electric vehicle market, the MG MGS5 EV distinguishes itself with impressive range and advanced tech features, appealing to eco-conscious buyers. In contrast, the MG HS/EHS, available in both petrol and plug-in hybrid variants, offers versatile performance and spacious interiors, catering to families seeking a reliable crossover. While the MGS5 EV leads in zero-emission urban driving, the HS/EHS provides a blend of convenience and adaptability for diverse driving needs.
Mazda CX-30
MG HS/EHS
CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
24000 - 36000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
14 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1625 - 1930 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4655 - 4670 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1663 - 1664 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1291 - 1484 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
170 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 195 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
275 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
125 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1496 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
MG

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-30 showcases its premium interior and striking design, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and comfort. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Vitara stands out with its rugged versatility and off-road capabilities, making it a great choice for adventurous drivers. Ultimately, while both SUVs offer unique strengths, the decision will hinge on personal preferences regarding style versus practicality.
Mazda CX-30
Mazda MX-30
VS
In the rapidly evolving world of crossover SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the Mazda MX-30 represent distinct approaches to modern driving needs, each with its unique charm. The CX-30 captivates with its robust yet refined design supported by a traditional internal combustion engine, focusing on practicality and spirited performance. On the other hand, the MX-30, Mazda's first all-electric offering, caters to eco-conscious drivers with its stylish, unconventional design and commendable focus on sustainability, making it an intriguing option for those ready to embrace the electric vehicle market.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.