VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota bZ4X comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 380 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Toyota bZ4X?

Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota bZ4X: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • noticeably lighter

Toyota bZ4X

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Toyota bZ4X costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,614 £.

bZ4X

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota bZ4X offers significantly more power – delivering 380 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 194 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota bZ4X is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota bZ4X delivers noticeably more torque with 338 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 98 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is noticeably lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 445 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota bZ4X offers only slightly more boot space – 452 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 22 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota bZ4X carries moderately more – 565 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota bZ4X is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
bZ4X

Toyota bZ4X

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 380 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 444 - 591 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota bZ4X delivers serene electric driving, a spacious, tech-forward cabin and genuine zero-emissions appeal, while the Toyota C-HR+ packages Toyota’s clever hybrid economy into a sharper, more affordable crossover with punchy urban manners. Choose the bZ4X if you want EV range and futuristic …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota bZ4X

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota bZ4X

The Toyota bZ4X is a fresh, roomy electric crossover that pairs Toyota’s trademark reliability with bold, angular styling and a cabin designed for everyday comfort. It may not chase headlines like some flashier rivals, but for buyers who want sensible electric motoring with practical packaging and a relaxed, confident ride, it’s an easy, pleasant choice.

details
74823-2021kf3bz4xhigh003-web-lr
74824-2021kf3bz4xhigh004-web-lr
74825-2021kf3bz4xhigh005-web-lr
74838-2021kf3bz4xinteriorhigh002-web-lr
74840-2021kf3bz4xinteriorhigh004-web-lr
74851-2021kf3bz4xinteriorhigh015-web-lr

Reviews Toyota bZ4X

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Claus Mortensen
20 Feb 2026, 14:56:45

Cool car, superb seat comfort, simple controls, delightful driving comfort, stylish design, the best warranty on the market.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Lexus RZ
Toyota bZ4X
VS
Meet the Lexus RZ and its more down-to-earth sibling, the Toyota bZ4X: one dressed in luxury and poised to impress, the other built to be sensible, spacious and affordable. We’ll pit the RZ’s sharper handling, plush cabin and premium tech against the bZ4X’s practicality and value to see which …
Toyota bZ4X
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Toyota bZ4X stakes its claim as a sensible, go-anywhere electric with Toyota toughness and straightforward tech, while the Skoda Elroq answers with clever packaging, sharper styling and a dose of European practicality. In this short showdown we’ll cut through badges and specs to tell you which …
Toyota bZ4X
BYD Sealion 7
VS
The Toyota bZ4X feels like a reliably mellow electric SUV — conservative styling, predictable handling and Toyota-level build confidence for buyers who want fuss-free ownership. The BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, punches above its price with slick tech, impressive range and a sportier edge, making it …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Subaru Outback
Toyota bZ4X
VS
Subaru Outback and Toyota bZ4X go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota bZ4X

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
36,800 - 51,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
444 - 591 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,180 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
375 - 565 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
167 - 380 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
123 - 280 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.