VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Volvo V60 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Volvo V60?

Mazda CX-30 vs Volvo V60: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,186 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo V60 uses 2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.7 L/100km.

V60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers considerably more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 164 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V60 delivers significantly more torque with 589 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 349 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is a bit lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,734 kg. The difference is around 279 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo V60 offers somewhat more boot space – 519 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 89 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo V60 carries marginally more – 506 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo V60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,400
V60

Volvo V60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 197 - 350 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2 - 6.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 99 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo V60

The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.

details
228902_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
228900_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
228898_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
247770_Volvo_V60_T8_Test_Drive_in_Lule_Sweden
223558_New_Volvo_V60_exterior

Reviews Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Michael Hauser
2 Oct 2025, 08:00:10

I drive a V60 T6 TE e‑AWD Inscription MY 2022

Overall I'm very satisfied with it.

Positives +
+ Safety
+ Performance
+ Fuel consumption
+ Service and running costs
+ Driving feel (still has a bit of the Swedish tank about it)
+ Average consumption 5.2 l/100 km

Negatives -
- 180 km/h limiter, supposedly due to excessive centrifugal forces on the electric motor
- Thinner side windows than the predecessor
- Still very firm suspension
- 8‑speed automatic (feels like the car is always shifting)
- Volvo's own customer service has massively deteriorated in recent years (their new motto seems to be "take it or leave it")

As a long‑time Volvo customer, this will be my last Volvo — I'm not willing to go along with the (now purely electric and largely China‑produced) madness.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Lexus UX and the Mazda CX-30, both models stand out in the competitive compact crossover segment, yet they cater to different priorities. The Lexus UX excels with its luxurious interior and top-notch safety features, making it a desirable choice for those …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mercedes C Class Wagon
Volvo V60
VS
The Mercedes C Class Wagon and Volvo V60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Honda Civic
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Honda Civic and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
Mazda CX-30
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
99 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
45 - 140 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
460 - 506 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.