VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Volvo V60 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-30 or Volvo V60?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Volvo V60 costs 41600 £. That’s a price difference of around 16414 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo V60 manages with 2.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 3.30 L per 100 km.

V60 @ media.volvocars.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 has a decisively edge – offering 455 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 269 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 3.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs slightly better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Volvo V60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo V60 pulls decisively stronger with 709 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 469 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is slightly lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1734 kg. The difference is around 279 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo V60 offers a bit more room – 519 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 89 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo V60 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1431 L, which is about 25 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Volvo V60 slight takes the win – 506 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo V60 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £41,600
228902_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue

Volvo V60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 197 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.4 - 6.2 L
  • Electric Range : 92 km
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Volvo V60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo V60 exudes a sense of refined elegance with its sleek design and smooth contours, making it a standout in the estate car category. Inside, it offers a harmonious blend of luxury and functionality with premium materials and state-of-the-art technology, ensuring a comfortable driving experience. Its performance on the road is impressive, combining efficient handling with a powerful yet quiet ride, making it a favourite for those who appreciate both style and substance.

details
228902_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue @ media.volvocars.com
228900_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue @ media.volvocars.com
228898_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue @ media.volvocars.com
247770_Volvo_V60_T8_Test_Drive_in_Lule_Sweden @ media.volvocars.com
223558_New_Volvo_V60_exterior @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
Mazda CX-30
Volvo V60
CX-30
V60

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
41600 - 64200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 6.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
92 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
54 - 140 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
60 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1734 - 2064 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4778 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1850 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1432 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1431 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
466 - 506 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a …
Audi A5 Avant
Volvo V60
VS
The Audi A5 Avant and Volvo V60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-30
Opel Mokka
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Opel Mokka compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.