Compare performance (186 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 20,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or SEAT Arona?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive segment is constantly evolving, and in the compact SUV segment, two standout contenders are the Mazda CX-30 and the SEAT Arona. Both vehicles cater to a growing audience that values versatility, advanced technology, and dynamic driving experiences. In this article, we'll dive deep into the specifications, features, and innovations that define these two remarkable SUVs.
The Mazda CX-30 presents a striking design that embodies Mazda's Kodo philosophy, which emphasizes elegance and a sense of motion. Measuring 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height, the CX-30 offers a robust and modern silhouette that appeals to many buyers.
On the other hand, the SEAT Arona, while smaller at 4153 mm in length, 1780 mm in width, and 1537 mm in height, still boasts an athletic stance and an eye-catching design. The Arona targets urban drivers who appreciate a compact vehicle but do not want to sacrifice style and functionality.
Looking under the hood, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a range of petrol hybrid engines, offering two power outputs: 140 HP and 186 HP. Its 1998 cm³ engine provides sufficient torque (up to 240 Nm), allowing it to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds. The CX-30 also features both a manual and automatic gearbox, catering to different driving preferences.
The SEAT Arona offers three petrol engine options, ranging from 95 HP to a potent 150 HP. The standout performance version can reach 0 to 100 km/h in a competitive 8.4 seconds. The Arona’s engine lineup is complemented by a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic option for seamless gear shifts, making it a solid choice for performance-oriented drivers.
Fuel efficiency is a crucial aspect for many buyers. The Mazda CX-30 records a consumption figure between 5.7 and 6.6 L/100 km, which is commendable for its class, given its performance capabilities. The vehicle also emits CO2 levels ranging from 129 to 148 g/km, placing it in an efficiency class of D to E.
On the contrary, the SEAT Arona excels slightly in this category, offering a remarkable consumption between 5.4 and 5.6 L/100 km and CO2 emissions ranging from 122 to 128 g/km, solidifying its position in the D efficiency class. This makes the Arona a more environmentally friendly option for those concerned about emissions.
Inside, the Mazda CX-30 emphasizes a premium feel, incorporating high-quality materials and an ergonomic layout. The spacious cabin comfortably seats five adults, with a trunk capacity of 430 liters, making it practical for daily use. The CX-30 also integrates a suite of modern technology, including a user-friendly infotainment system with smartphone connectivity, advanced safety features, and driver-assist technologies.
The SEAT Arona, on the other hand, offers a youthful and tech-savvy interior. Its trunk capacity of 400 liters is slightly less than that of the CX-30, but it still provides ample storage for everyday needs. The Arona focuses heavily on connectivity, featuring an advanced infotainment system with accessibility to various apps, making it a favorite among younger drivers.
In conclusion, both the Mazda CX-30 and the SEAT Arona bring unique strengths to the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 impresses with its performance, upscale interior, and advanced safety technologies, while the Arona stands out with its fuel efficiency, compact dimensions for urban driving, and youthful flair.
Your choice ultimately depends on your personal priorities: whether you lean towards performance and comfort or prefer efficiency and style. Test driving both vehicles will surely help in making the right decision tailored to your needs.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
SEAT Arona is markedly cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,534 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the SEAT Arona uses 5.3 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers moderately more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.3 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the SEAT Arona delivers only slightly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, SEAT Arona is markedly lighter – 1,188 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 267 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers barely more boot space – 430 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
When it comes to payload, the SEAT Arona carries only slightly more – 522 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.
The Mazda CX-30 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.
details
The SEAT Arona is a compact crossover that blends practical, city-friendly packaging with a sporty, youthful design. It delivers a comfortable ride, an intuitive cabin and economical running costs, making it a sensible pick for daily drives and weekend getaways.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
Price
20,700 - 30,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
120 - 132 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
Curb weight
1,188 - 1,268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,780 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
502 - 522 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
SEAT
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España