What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-30's engine?

The Mazda CX-30 reaches a peak output of 186 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-30 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.70 L.

What drivetrain options does the Volvo XC90 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Volvo XC90's engine?

Up to 455 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Volvo XC90 use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 3.50 L.

How far can the Volvo XC90 go on a full charge?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 71 km.

What is the battery capacity of the Volvo XC90?

The Volvo XC90 comes with a 14.70 kWh battery.

How fast can the Volvo XC90 go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 180 km/h.

What are the Volvo XC90’s length, width and height?

Length 4953 mm, width 1923 mm, height 1771 mm – those are the dimensions of the Volvo XC90.

Mazda CX-30 vs Volvo XC90 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 44528 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC90 manages with 3.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 2.20 L per 100 km.

XC90

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 has a clearly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 269 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC90 pulls decisively stronger with 709 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 469 Nm difference.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Volvo XC90 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is clearly lighter – 1455 kg compared to 2080 kg. The difference is around 625 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers noticeable more room – 430 L compared to 302 L. That’s a difference of about 128 L.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC90 evident takes the win – 710 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 214 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC90 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Volvo XC90

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma

Mazda CX-30

VS

In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …

Lexus LBX

Mazda CX-30

VS

The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …

Costs and Consumption
Price 25200 - 36800 £	Price 69800 - 84600 £
Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L	Consumption L/100km 3.5 - 8.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 71 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 14.70 kWh
co2 129 - 148 g/km	co2 79 - 191 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 7
Doors -	Doors 5
Curb weight 1455 - 1587 kg	Curb weight 2080 - 2297 kg
Trunk capacity 422 - 430 L	Trunk capacity 262 - 302 L
Length -	Length 4953 mm
Width 1795 mm	Width 1923 mm
Height -	Height 1771 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1816 - 1856 L
Payload 458 - 496 kg	Payload 653 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 186 HP	Power HP 250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 10.3 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 7.7 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed 180 km/h
Torque 238 - 240 Nm	Torque 360 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 103 - 137 kW	Power kW 184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 1969 cm3