In the battle of compact crossovers, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its sleek design and sporty driving dynamics, making it a thrilling option for enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the VW Taigo impresses with its practicality and spacious interior, catering to those seeking versatility without compromising style. Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on whether buyers prioritize performance or everyday functionality.
The automotive landscape continues to evolve with compact SUVs gaining popularity among urban drivers and families. Among the contenders in this segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Volkswagen Taigo stand out for their unique offerings. This article presents a detailed comparison of the two vehicles highlighting their technical specifications, innovative features, and driving experiences.
The Mazda CX-30 enters the arena with two engine options: a 2.0-liter petrol engine producing 186 hp and a 2.5-liter alternative delivering 140 hp. These engines, paired with either a manual or an automatic gearbox, provide versatility in driving preferences. The CX-30 can achieve a top speed of 204 km/h and accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, demonstrating its sporty edge.
In contrast, the VW Taigo offers a range of powertrains including a 1.0-liter engine with outputs of 95 hp, 115 hp, and a 1.5-liter option offering 150 hp. The Taigo's optimal engine configuration can reach a top speed of 212 km/h with a commendable acceleration time of 8.2 seconds. The Taigo's focus appears to lie in delivering a balanced performance suited for city driving.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the CX-30 holds its ground with consumption figures ranging between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km depending on the engine configuration. This places it in a competitive position among compact SUVs.
The VW Taigo, however, edges this competition slightly, with consumption figures as low as 5.4 L/100 km, making it an excellent option for those conscious of fuel costs. With a smaller 40-liter fuel tank, the Taigo still manages to provide adequate range for everyday use despite its less robust capacity compared to the CX-30's 51-liter tank.
In terms of size, the Mazda CX-30 measures 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height, while the VW Taigo is slightly smaller at 4266 mm in length, 1757 mm in width, and 1518 mm in height. The CX-30’s larger dimensions translate into a roomy interior and a trunk capacity of 430 liters, which can accommodate more luggage or gear.
On the other hand, the VW Taigo offers a marginally larger trunk space at 440 liters, despite its smaller exterior footprint. This clever packaging maximizes cargo potential, making it an attractive choice for daily errands and weekend adventures alike.
Inside, both vehicles offer a modern and user-friendly cabin featuring high-quality materials. The CX-30 shines with its emphasis on driver-focused design and advanced technology like the Mazda Connect infotainment system, which integrates seamlessly with smartphones and comes with a responsive touchscreen.
The Volkswagen Taigo, leans heavily on its tech-savvy approach with a digital cockpit displaying essential data at a glance. The infotainment system is quick and intuitive, though some may find the touch buttons less tactile compared to traditional knobs.
Safety is paramount in both SUVs. The Mazda CX-30 comes equipped with a suite of Driver Assistance Technologies including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and automated emergency braking, earning high safety ratings from testing agencies.
Similarly, the VW Taigo features an impressive array of safety technologies, including front assist with emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring. Both vehicles promise peace of mind regardless of the driving conditions.
Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and Volkswagen Taigo ultimately hinges on individual preferences. The CX-30 offers a more dynamic driving experience with a sportier performance angle and a slightly larger, practical cabin, making it suitable for those needing versatility.
The Taigo, meanwhile, caters to urbanites seeking exceptional fuel economy and a compact, stylish profile without sacrificing practicality. Both vehicles are well-equipped, ensuring that whichever you choose, you will not be disappointed.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 24800 - 36300
£
|
Price
about 19600 - 31300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
129 - 148
g/km
|
co2
123 - 132
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587
kg
|
Curb weight
1229 - 1292
kg
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430
L
|
Trunk capacity
440
L
|
Length
4395
mm
|
Length
4266
mm
|
Width
1795
mm
|
Width
1757
mm
|
Height
1540
mm
|
Height
1518
mm
|
Payload
458 - 496
kg
|
Payload
448 - 457
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
140 - 186
HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 11.1
s
|
Max Speed
191 - 204
km/h
|
Max Speed
184 - 212
km/h
|
Torque
238 - 240
Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
103 - 137
kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Top speed
191 - 204
km/h
|
Top speed
184 - 212
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.