@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Arkana – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Renault Arkana?

Mazda CX-5

3 (1 Reviews)
rate

Renault Arkana

4 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Arkana has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £, while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30000 £. That’s a price difference of around 1543 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Arkana has a slight edge – offering 143 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-5 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 10.50 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-5 performs somewhat better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 23 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-5 pulls to a small extent stronger with 238 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 33 Nm difference.

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Renault Arkana is hardly perceptible lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 119 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers to a small extent more room – 583 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 103 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2019 L, which is about 756 L more than the Renault Arkana.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-5 proves to be edges ahead and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-5 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Mazda CX-5
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £30,000
CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7 - 7.4 L
details

Mazda CX-5

3 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1) @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Renault Arkana

4 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p @ Renault Group Media
r210654p @ Renault Group Media
r210665p @ Renault Group Media
r210657p @ Renault Group Media
r210613p @ Renault Group Media
r210616p @ Renault Group Media

Reviews Mazda CX-5

3 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Arkana
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Arkana
CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
30000 - 39500 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1629 - 1671 kg
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
583 L
Trunk capacity
480 L
Length
4690 mm
Length
4568 mm
Width
1860 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
1695 mm
Height
1576 mm
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
Payload
-
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
172 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In a competitive segment, the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-5 stand out with distinct personalities, offering drivers a blend of style and functionality. While the Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the CX-5 captivates with its dynamic handling and upscale interior …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Arkana
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Arkana
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Rafale
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana stands out with its sleek coupe-like design, appealing to those who prioritize style alongside functionality. Meanwhile, the Renault Rafale offers a more traditional SUV layout, emphasizing practicality and spaciousness for families and …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
Mitsubishi ASX
VS
Mazda CX-5 and Mitsubishi ASX go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Dacia Bigster compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?

The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.

do not click