VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Captur comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 21,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Renault Captur?

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Captur: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more trunk space

Renault Captur

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Captur is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,863 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.

Captur

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Captur offers somewhat more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Captur is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mazda CX-5 is marginally faster – reaching 195 km/h, while the Renault Captur tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Captur delivers somewhat more torque with 265 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 27 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is markedly lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 306 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers noticeably more boot space – 583 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 161 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 offers visibly more capacity – up to 2,019 L, about 656 L more than the Renault Captur.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries visibly more – 601 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 148 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Captur is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,100
Captur

Renault Captur

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Captur is the practical, pocket-sized crossover that balances frugal running costs, clever packaging and everyday comfort — the sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. By contrast the Renault Symbioz is a bold electric concept, part living room, part lab car, …
Honda HR-V
Renault Captur
VS
The Honda HR-V and Renault Captur go bumper-to-bumper in the small SUV ring, where style, space, and running costs matter more than lap times. We pit Japan’s pragmatic hybrid hero against France’s chic, tech-savvy all-rounder to see which one deserves your driveway—and your monthly payments.
Mazda CX-5
Renault Captur

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Captur

The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.

details
r210470p
r210480p
r210476p
r210485p

Reviews Renault Captur

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pet
4 Feb 2026, 11:01:12

The car was a very pleasant surprise. Very comfortable and enjoyable. The 1.3 TCe 158 hp engine is brilliant.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Waldemar
1 Feb 2026, 13:55:20

A 2025 mild‑hybrid, 160 hp.
Really nice little car. Mostly doing 200 km trips. Driving isn’t tiring. I trusted the driver‑assistance systems and… I wasn’t disappointed. The adaptive cruise control is brilliant, though I’d trust it about 90%. Overtaking punch is a plus. I recommend it with a clear conscience. Ah, just those 18" wheels 🤦. Obviously fuel consumption is higher because it’s an automatic.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Dacia Duster
Renault Captur
VS
Think of the Dacia Duster as the bargain-basement SUV that treats rough roads like a challenge and your wallet like a VIP—rugged, simple and brutally practical. The Renault Captur, by contrast, is the fashion-forward city slicker with sharper looks, more tech and a softer ride, ideal if you want …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Captur
VS
The Dacia Sandero is the no-nonsense value king—spacious, economical and brutally practical for buyers who want transport, not trinkets. The Renault Captur, by contrast, bundles sharper styling, more tech and a cosier cabin into a compact SUV package, so you pay extra for polish and personality.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Opel Mokka
Renault Captur
VS
The Opel Mokka prowls the urban jungle with bold styling and surprisingly sharp handling that makes it feel like a grown-up compact SUV, while the Renault Captur plays the sensible diplomat with a softer ride, clever cabin tricks and a friendlier fuel bill. Pick the Mokka if you want punchy driver …
Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
Renault Captur
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the compact crossover duel, the Renault Captur charms with bold styling, a roomy, customisable interior and punchy petrol or hybrid engines, while the Toyota Yaris Cross plays the long game with Toyota’s trademark reliability, clever packaging and class-leading hybrid fuel economy. If you want …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Captur

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
21,100 - 28,400 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
100 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Length
4,690 mm
Length
4,239 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Height
1,575 mm
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Max trunk capacity
1,363 L
Payload
601 kg
Payload
447 - 453 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.