VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Renault Clio?

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Clio is significantly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,934 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers moderately more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-5 delivers noticeably more torque with 238 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 48 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is noticeably lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 427 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers noticeably more boot space – 466 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 139 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries markedly more – 601 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 138 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Mazda CX-5
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
Mazda CX-5
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.