VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Mégane comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Renault Mégane?

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Mégane: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • barely lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Renault Mégane

  • noticeably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-5 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Renault Mégane costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,066 £.

Mégane

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Mégane offers noticeably more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 77 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Mégane is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mazda CX-5 is a bit faster – reaching 195 km/h, while the Renault Mégane tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 35 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Mégane delivers markedly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 62 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is barely lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,719 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers clearly more boot space – 583 L compared to 389 L. That’s a difference of about 194 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 offers visibly more capacity – up to 2,019 L, about 687 L more than the Renault Mégane.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries clearly more – 601 kg compared to 446 kg. That’s a difference of about 155 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Mégane is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £35,100
Mégane

Renault Mégane

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 452 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Mégane
VS
It’s the classic value-versus-style standoff: the Dacia Sandero arrives like a sensible bargain you can live with every day, while the Renault Mégane promises sharper looks and a dose of refinement — for a healthier cheque. We’ll drive, measure and compare practicality, economy and driving feel to …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Mégane

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Mégane

The Renault Mégane blends Gallic flair with practical everyday charm, showing that sensible transport can still have personality and poise. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want a comfortable, stylish hatchback that feels a little more special than the usual commute companion.

details
r211807p
r211799p
r211793p
r211756p
r211745p

Reviews Renault Mégane

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Renault Captur
Renault Mégane
VS
Small, raised and city-savvy, the Renault Captur is the compact crossover for shoppers who want higher seating, flexible space and an easygoing ride; the Renault Mégane, by contrast, is a sharper hatch that rewards drivers with crisper handling and a more planted feel. If your life is school runs …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Renault Clio
Renault Mégane
VS
In the battle between the Renault Clio and Renault Mégane, drivers will find two distinct personalities within the same brand's lineup. The Clio charms with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for urban environments, while the Mégane offers a more spacious interior and a sporty …
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique blends of performance and style. The Mazda CX-5 impresses with its refined interior and sporty handling, making it a driver's delight on winding roads. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a fun and …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Renault Mégane
Renault Scénic
VS
Renault Mégane and Renault Scénic go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-5
Renault Mégane

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
35,100 - 38,500 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
452 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,719 kg
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Trunk capacity
389 L
Length
4,690 mm
Length
4,200 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,783 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Max trunk capacity
1,332 L
Payload
601 kg
Payload
446 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
160 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
160 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.