VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Suzuki Vitara - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (141 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (30000 £ vs 23600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Suzuki Vitara?

CX-5

Mazda CX-5 vs. Suzuki Vitara: A Detailed SUV Showdown

As the SUV market continues to thrive, two models often capture the attention of consumers looking for a blend of style, performance, and practicality: the Mazda CX-5 and the Suzuki Vitara. Both of these SUVs offer a unique set of features that cater to a variety of needs and preferences. In this article, we delve into their technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance to help you make an informed decision.

Vitara

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-5 is known for its sleek, modern design, exuding a premium look with its smooth curves and refined details. Measuring 4575 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height, it provides a substantial presence on the road. The CX-5's interior is equally impressive, offering a trunk capacity of 510 to 522 liters, catering to the needs of families and adventurers alike.

On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara offers a more compact option, with a length of 4185 mm, a width of 1775 mm, and a height of 1595 mm. This makes it more suitable for urban environments where parking space is limited. Its trunk capacity ranges from 289 to 375 liters, ideal for daily errands and short trips.

CX-5

Engine and Performance

The Mazda CX-5 offers a range of engines, including petrol mild hybrid electric vehicles (MHEV) and diesel options. With power outputs ranging from 150 to 194 HP, and torque between 213 to 445 Nm, the CX-5 is all about delivering robust performance. It comes with both manual and automatic transmissions and varies between front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive systems. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h spans from 9.2 to 11.1 seconds, depending on the version, with a maximum speed reaching up to 208 km/h.

The Suzuki Vitara provides a more simplified engine lineup with petrol MHEV and full hybrid options, offering power outputs of 116 and 129 HP. The torque figure stands at a competitive 235 Nm, with a choice between manual and automated manual transmissions. The Vitara accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 9.5 to 12.7 seconds, with a maximum speed up to 190 km/h, which suffices for typical daily driving experiences.

Vitara

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is a strong suit for both vehicles. The Mazda CX-5 boasts a consumption rate of 5.6 to 7.6 L/100km, aligning with its CO2 emissions between 146 to 173 g/km. Despite having a larger engine capacity, the CX-5 manages its efficiency well, making it an appealing choice for those who prioritize performance without compromising on eco-friendliness.

In comparison, the Suzuki Vitara prides itself on exceptional fuel economy with a consumption of 5.0 to 5.6 L/100km. CO2 emissions range from 113 to 129 g/km, positioning it as a more environmentally conscious choice for urban dwellers and long-distance commuters alike.

CX-5

Conclusion

Both the Mazda CX-5 and Suzuki Vitara offer compelling packages in the SUV segment. The CX-5 is perfect for those who desire a bolder presence and a potent engine lineup, whereas the Vitara caters to those who seek a more compact, fuel-efficient option with hybrid flexibility. Ultimately, the choice comes down to your personal needs, whether it be performance or practicality, making either option a worthy contender in the bustling SUV arena.

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate

Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Vitara

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Vitara has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23600 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6429 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Vitara manages with 5 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara has a evident edge – offering 184 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 3.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-5 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Suzuki Vitara pulls distinct stronger with 307 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 69 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is noticeable lighter – 1255 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 374 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers distinct more room – 583 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 208 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs clearly better – up to 2019 L, which is about 899 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Vitara is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-5
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £23,600
Vitara

Suzuki Vitara

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 110 - 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 16.6 kWh
  • Electric Range : 344 - 426 km
details

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.

details
Suzuki_Vitara_002
Suzuki_Vitara_020
Suzuki_Vitara_039
Suzuki_Vitara_023
Suzuki_Vitara_004
Vitara_9

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles …
Suzuki Vitara
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Suzuki Vitara is the chunky, no-nonsense compact SUV that gives you more space, a tougher look and better off-road chops for less cash, while the Toyota Yaris Cross is the clever, hybrid-savvy city slicker that prioritises efficiency, refinement and tech. Pick the Vitara if you want practicality …
Mazda CX-5
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption
Price
30000 - 39500 £
Price
23600 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
0 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1629 - 1671 kg
Curb weight
1255 - 1935 kg
Trunk capacity
583 L
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
Length
4690 mm
Length
4185 mm
Width
1860 mm
Width
1775 - 1800 mm
Height
1695 mm
Height
1595 mm
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
Max trunk capacity
1046 - 1120 L
Payload
-
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
Engine capacity
2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Suzuki

Similar Comparisons

Dacia Duster
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Dacia Duster still shocks with back-to-basics toughness and an unbeatable price — real off-road chops and a cavernous boot for a fraction of the bill — while the Suzuki Vitara answers with sharper handling, nicer interior materials and smarter tech that feels a touch more grown-up. Choose the …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
In a competitive segment, the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-5 stand out with distinct personalities, offering drivers a blend of style and functionality. While the Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the CX-5 captivates with its dynamic handling and upscale interior …
Skoda Kamiq
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Skoda Kamiq and Suzuki Vitara stand out in the competitive compact SUV segment, each offering unique strengths. The Kamiq impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology features, catering to those who prioritize comfort and connectivity. Meanwhile, the Vitara boasts robust off-road …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Austral
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 continues to stand out with its sleek design, upscale interior, and refined driving dynamics. In contrast, the Renault Austral brings a fresh approach with its modern tech offerings and distinctive European flair, making it a formidable …
Kia Sportage
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Kia Sportage and Suzuki Vitara each offer distinct advantages that appeal to different types of drivers. The Sportage impresses with its stylish design, advanced technology features, and spacious interior, making it a strong contender for families …
Opel Frontera
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Opel Frontera and Suzuki Vitara stand out in the compact SUV segment, each offering a unique blend of capability and comfort. The Frontera impresses with its rugged build and off-road prowess, making it a reliable choice for adventure seekers. Meanwhile, the Vitara's agile handling and …
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?

The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.