VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Toyota C-HR?

Mazda CX-5 vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR

4.6 (12 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Toyota C-HR is only slightly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.7 L/100km.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers markedly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is barely lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 124 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers barely more boot space – 466 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries clearly more – 601 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 176 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
C-HR

Toyota C-HR

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 223 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 66 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross comes down to whether you prefer the C-HR’s sharper styling and firmer, more engaging ride or the Yaris Cross’s roomier practicality and better efficiency. I’ll compare their driving feel, interior comfort, fuel economy, and features to …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla comes down to whether you want a compact crossover's higher driving position and distinctive styling or a traditional compact car's practicality and efficiency. The C-HR emphasizes bold looks and a more SUV-like feel, while the Corolla …
Mazda CX-5
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.6 (12 Reviews)
rate
Owners generally report the Toyota C‑HR as an efficient, comfortable small crossover with a dependable feel and a modern, slightly futuristic design. Many praise its strong fuel economy, smooth ride—especially for rear passengers—good handling and reliability, while some point out the boot is a bit tight and overall practicality can feel limited for larger loads or more than two occupants. These impressions mostly come from city and commuter use, so long-distance or heavy-family needs might produce different priorities.
Marcin
7 Sept 2026, 18:03:01

I own a C‑HR 2 — great handling. Average fuel consumption as of today (8,300 km): 4 L. City driving and commutes to work outside the city on a national road — 15 km one way.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jan
4 Sept 2026, 18:26:05

Nice car, very fuel-efficient! The 2.0 version is also quite quick.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Vicente
6 Aug 2026, 17:44:55

It's very comfortable and smooth. Rear space and the trunk are a bit tight, but for two people it's fine. Super economical, pleasant to drive and very comfortable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jan
16 May 2026, 20:51:01

Great driving comfort, admittedly short trips, but above all a cool impression.

Rav is for wimps.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sam baba
25 Apr 2026, 21:54:02

Reliability and no maintenance costs, plus a futuristic design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers with similar footprints but aimed at different buyers. The LBX prioritizes premium materials, a quieter ride and upscale features, while the C-HR emphasizes bold styling, engaging handling and stronger value for money.
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers who want agile packaging and distinctive style. The UX leans on Lexus-level refinement and a premium cabin, while the C-HR emphasizes bolder styling and strong value for money.
Ford Kuga
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Ford Kuga and the Toyota C‑HR are two popular compact crossovers that appeal to buyers who want a mix of practicality and economy but with different priorities. The Kuga emphasises family-friendly space, ride comfort and a broad choice of powertrains including plug‑in hybrid variants, whereas …
Nissan Qashqai
Toyota C-HR
VS
Choose the Nissan Qashqai if you want a sensible, roomy compact SUV that puts comfort, practicality and a grown-up cockpit ahead of flash; pick the Toyota C‑HR if you crave jaw‑dropping design, a taut chassis and the option of frugal hybrid running—at the cost of rear-seat space and a firmer ride. …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
CUPRA Formentor
Toyota C-HR
VS
CUPRA Formentor and Toyota C‑HR are two compact crossovers that take very different approaches: the Formentor leans into sporty performance and bold style, while the C‑HR focuses on hybrid efficiency and everyday practicality. Below I’ll walk through the key differences to help you decide which …
Honda HR-V
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Honda HR‑V and Toyota C‑HR are two popular compact crossovers that take very different approaches: the HR‑V emphasizes space, comfort and everyday practicality, while the C‑HR prioritizes eye‑catching styling and a sportier driving feel. If you value flexible cargo space and a more conventional …
Mazda CX-5
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.