VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Volvo EX30 comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 33,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Volvo EX30?

Mazda CX-5 vs Volvo EX30: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
  • significantly more trunk space

Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-5 is a bit cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Volvo EX30 costs 33,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,000 £.

EX30

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers substantially more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 287 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 6.9 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mazda CX-5 is barely faster – reaching 195 km/h, while the Volvo EX30 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers clearly more torque with 543 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 305 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is somewhat lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 211 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers significantly more boot space – 583 L compared to 318 L. That’s a difference of about 265 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 offers substantially more capacity – up to 2,019 L, about 1,019 L more than the Volvo EX30.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries noticeably more – 601 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 211 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX30 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,000
EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 339 - 476 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Michael
10 Feb 2026, 21:18:58

...the best electric car we've driven so far. Trouble-free, safe, tidy and easy to use.

The German predecessors (the Wolfsburg group) can be completely forgotten!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Julien B.
10 Feb 2026, 15:47:03

A car that could have been brilliant, ruined by technological dogmatism. Ninety‑five percent of this car’s problems are between the windshield and the steering wheel. The positives are undone by a botched implantation of technology at all costs. Basic functions are hard to access, buried in menus, and the constant, useless warnings and alerts make the experience frustrating and wreck the overall ergonomics. Add recurring issues with the door‑locking system that the dealer can’t fix after several visits, a range far below what’s promised, and a collision‑avoidance system that randomly takes dangerous initiatives, and I can say this is the worst car I’ve ever bought. After several months, I deeply regret this purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
30 Dec 2025, 12:53:45

The onboard tech (tablet) takes too long to learn. It distracts from driving. Not suitable for the nearsighted — the tablet’s distance from your eyes basically forces you to wear trifocals. Letting off the gas slows the car, but it’s overly sensitive and you need time to get used to it. The buzzer for exceeding the speed limit is very annoying, and the system notices changes in road signs late. In short: driving it is stressful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
NickoNamo
22 Dec 2025, 18:10:11

Compact, attractive and—above all—safe car with a modern interior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
CUPRA Born
Volvo EX30
VS
In the battle of electric compacts, the CUPRA Born and Volvo EX30 each bring unique strengths to the table for eco-conscious drivers. The CUPRA Born impresses with its sporty design and dynamic handling, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a spirited drive. On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
Volvo EX30 and Volvo EC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique blends of performance and style. The Mazda CX-5 impresses with its refined interior and sporty handling, making it a driver's delight on winding roads. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a fun and …
Renault R5
Volvo EX30
VS
The Renault 5 brings playful retro charm and clever city-sized packaging, while the Volvo EX30 feels like a pocket rocket from the future with serious EV range and safety tech. If you want personality and urban thrift go R5, but if you crave rapid electric shove, cutting-edge gadgets and …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Volvo EX30
VW ID.3
VS
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact, sharply tuned EV with Scandinavian flair — sprightly, surprisingly premium and built to put a grin on urban commutes. The VW ID.3, by contrast, plays the sensible family card with more interior space, comfort and range options, so pick the EX30 for driving fun …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
33,000 - 49,100 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Trunk capacity
318 L
Length
4,690 mm
Length
4,233 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,838 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Height
1,550 mm
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Max trunk capacity
1,000 L
Payload
601 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.