VS

Mazda CX-5 vs VW Transporter Transporter comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 286 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 37,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or VW Transporter Transporter?

Mazda CX-5 vs VW Transporter Transporter: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • a bit lighter
details

VW Transporter Transporter

  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-5 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the VW Transporter Transporter costs 37,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,524 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-5 uses 7 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the VW Transporter Transporter with 7.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Transporter Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Transporter Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Transporter Transporter is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Transporter Transporter delivers substantially more torque with 415 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 177 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is a bit lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,872 kg. The difference is around 243 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Transporter Transporter carries clearly more – 1,259 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 658 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Transporter Transporter holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,500
Transporter Transporter

VW Transporter Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 110 - 286 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.1 - 8.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.9 - 24.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 56 - 331 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Mazda CX-5
VW Transporter Transporter

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW Transporter Transporter

The VW Transporter is the workhorse of the modern tradesman, blending practical cleverness with a cabin that's actually pleasant to spend a long day in. It may not steal the style spotlight, but its unshowy durability, clever load solutions and easy-to-live-with character make it a sensible pick for businesses and weekend projects alike.

details
serpimg_ftmThr

Reviews VW Transporter Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Renault Trafic Transporter
VW Transporter Transporter
VS
Choosing between the Renault Trafic and the Volkswagen Transporter comes down to practical needs: load space, running costs and easy everyday use versus refinement, driving feel and long-term resale. The Trafic prioritises efficient packaging and economical ownership, while the Transporter is known …
VW Transporter Transporter
Kia PV5
VS
This comparison pits the VW Transporter—commonly just called the Transporter—against the Kia PV5 to help you decide which van suits your needs. I’ll cover practicality, driving dynamics, running costs and key features so you can pick the better fit for work or family use.
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX and Mazda CX-5 are two popular compact SUVs — the NX emphasizes luxury and refinement while the CX-5 focuses on sporty handling and strong value. This short comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model excels in comfort, technology, fuel economy, and driving feel so …
VW ID. Buzz Bus
VW Transporter Transporter
VS
Unsure whether the VW ID. Buzz Bus or the VW Transporter Transporter is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Fiat Scudo
VW Transporter Transporter
VS
In the competitive landscape of commercial vans, the Fiat Scudo and VW Transporter stand out for their practicality and versatility. While the Scudo offers an agile driving experience and impressive fuel efficiency, the Transporter is known for its robust build quality and enduring reliability. …
Mazda CX-5
VW Transporter Transporter

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
37,500 - 60,800 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.1 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.9 - 24.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
56 - 331 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
11.8 - 63.8 kWh
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 - 220 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,872 - 2,462 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
5,050 - 5,450 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
2,032 mm
Height
-
Height
1,966 - 1,985 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
755 - 1,259 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
110 - 286 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 16.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
112 - 150 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
310 - 415 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
81 - 210 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.