VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Audi Q5 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 367 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 46,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Audi Q5?

Mazda CX-60 vs Audi Q5: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

Audi Q5

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-60

The Battle of the SUVs: Audi Q5 vs. Mazda CX-60

The SUV market has been witnessing exponential growth, driven by consumer demand for versatile vehicles that can handle both urban and rugged terrains. Two contenders that have emerged as strong options in the mid-size SUV category are the Audi Q5 and the Mazda CX-60. Both vehicles come equipped with cutting-edge technology, but which one truly stands out? Let's delve into the specifics to find out.

Q5

Engine and Performance

The Audi Q5 comes with an array of engine options, including diesel MHEV, petrol MHEV, and plug-in hybrid. Power ranges from 163 HP to an impressive 367 HP, offering speeds of up to 250 km/h. Moreover, the Q5’s acceleration is noteworthy, with the quickest model sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.5 seconds. This SUV is available with all-wheel and front-wheel drive options, providing flexibility in drivetrain preference.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-60 presents a compelling argument with its plug-in hybrid and diesel MHEV engines. Delivering a maximum of 327 HP, the CX-60 can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in an impressive 5.8 seconds. All-wheel and rear-wheel drive options cater to different driving styles, and its top speed reaches 219 km/h.

CX-60

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to fuel efficiency, both vehicles make significant strides. The Audi Q5's consumption rates range from 1.5 to 8.4 L/100km depending on the model, while the CX-60 is slightly more efficient with consumption rates between 1.4 and 5.4 L/100km. In terms of electric range, the CX-60 boasts a 64 km range, slightly edging out Audi's 62 km, which might appeal to eco-conscious drivers.

Regarding emissions, the Mazda CX-60 takes the lead with CO2 emissions starting as low as 31 g/km, whereas the Audi Q5 ranges from 154 to 213 g/km.

Q5

Interior and Comfort

Both the Audi Q5 and Mazda CX-60 provide seating for five passengers, each offering a spacious interior designed for comfort and practicality. The trunk capacity is another consideration, with the Q5 offering between 455 and 520 liters, while the CX-60 offers a more generous 570 liters of cargo space.

Luxury and comfort features abound in both models, including state-of-the-art infotainment systems and advanced safety technologies, ensuring a premium driving experience.

CX-60

Design and Dimensions

Visually, both SUVs exude elegance and strength. The Audi Q5 is slightly shorter at an approximate length of 4682 to 4717 mm, while the Mazda CX-60 stretches to 4745 mm. However, the width and height between both vehicles are comparable, offering a stable road presence.

Q5

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Audi Q5 and the Mazda CX-60 boils down to personal preference and priorities. If you seek high performance with a range of engine options and a luxurious driving experience, the Audi Q5 might be your vehicle of choice. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 provides a stronger case for eco-friendliness and cargo space efficiency.

Ultimately, both SUVs hold their own in the competitive market, offering strong value for their respective brands. Potential buyers will not be disappointed with either choice, as both serve as outstanding exemplars of modern automotive engineering.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q5
CUPRA Terramar
VS
Are you after classic polish or cheeky performance? We pit the Audi Q5’s grown-up refinement against the Cupra Terramar’s eager sportiness to see which mid-size SUV earns your money—and your grin.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-60 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Audi Q5 costs 46,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,700 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q5 uses 2.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q5 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 100 km, about 37 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Q5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q5 offers somewhat more power – delivering 367 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q5 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q5 delivers very slightly more torque with 580 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is marginally lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 1,910 kg. The difference is around 20 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers barely more boot space – 570 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries barely more – 612 kg compared to 565 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q5 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,400
Q5

Audi Q5

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 367 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.5 - 8.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 92 - 100 km
details
Mazda CX-60
Audi Q5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Audi Q5

The Audi Q5 feels like the sensible luxury choice — polished cabin materials, a calm ride and enough tech to keep commuters and weekend adventurers equally pleased. It won't shout for attention but will quietly check the boxes for buyers who want refinement, space and everyday usability with a dash of Audi charisma.

details
A203044_overfull
A203047_overfull
A203051_overfull
A203054_overfull
A203068_overfull
A203069_overfull
A203075_overfull

Reviews Audi Q5

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Robert
16 Apr 2026, 20:24:39

Comfortable and composed on the road — an excellent car for daily use. I drive the Q5 TDI with standard suspension and 20‑inch wheels.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Aurelio
16 Mar 2026, 20:10:09

BYD — to Romania, in my area I have to recharge 5 times.
Audi Q5 — to the same place I refuel only 2 times.
At the end of the merry-go-round, if diesel doesn’t rise again, I can say I travel with peace of mind in the Audi — both on price and comfort 😆😆😆. If I switch on the air conditioning in the BYD, I’m totally screwed; for 1,350 km I’d need solar panels just to keep costs down.
But if I only drive around the city and do short runs, all praise to BYD.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Klaus
9 Dec 2025, 16:03:21

The Audi Q5 reliably gets me to my destination every day. It isn't cheap, but it's a real looker!!!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Audi Q5
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q5 remains the comfortable, all‑round workhorse — traditional petrol, diesel and mild‑hybrid engines give familiar range, agreeable handling and a practical boot for family life. The Audi Q6 e‑tron, meanwhile, catapults you into Audi’s electric future with sleek looks, a tech‑packed cabin …
Audi Q5
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q5 and Volkswagen Tayron present distinct offers for discerning drivers. The Q5 boasts a more luxurious interior with advanced technology and a refined ride, catering to premium enthusiasts. Conversely, the Tayron combines practicality with a …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Audi Q5
VW Tiguan
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q5 and VW Tiguan stand out for their blend of performance and practicality. While the Q5 offers a more upscale interior and a powerful engine lineup, the Tiguan impresses with its spacious cabin and user-friendly tech features, making it a strong …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-60
VS
Lexus NX and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Audi A4 Avant
Audi Q5
VS
In the comparison between the Audi A4 Avant and the Audi Q5, both models offer a blend of luxury and performance, catering to different lifestyle needs. The A4 Avant shines with its sleek, wagon body style that promises a spacious interior and an agile driving experience, perfect for city commuting …
Mazda CX-60
Audi Q5

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
46,400 - 79,600 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
92 - 100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
56 - 189 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,910 - 2,245 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
433 - 520 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,900 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
490 - 565 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
204 - 367 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
340 - 580 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
150 - 270 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,968 - 2,995 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Audi
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.