VS

Mazda CX-60 vs BYD Tang comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 517 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 64,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or BYD Tang?

Mazda CX-60 vs BYD Tang: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

BYD Tang

  • visibly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-60 is considerably cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the BYD Tang costs 64,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,614 £.

As for electric range, the BYD Tang offers significantly more range – reaching up to 530 km, about 467 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Tang

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang offers visibly more power – delivering 517 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Tang delivers a bit more torque with 680 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: BYD Tang offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is noticeably lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,630 kg. The difference is around 740 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers considerably more boot space – 570 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 335 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries very slightly more – 612 kg compared to 575 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Tang is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£64,285
Tang

BYD Tang

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 517 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 24 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 530 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mazda CX-60
BYD Tang

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

BYD Tang

The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.

details
8ee4e329-3f72-45c5-9cb4-b63b5ddb555e
de335338-ec26-419d-842a-9f53ec65c2c6
9fcec901-74bd-4e0f-8761-2897e2f597bf
24737df2-4e98-4799-b7e2-d4d5c2437265
c342d66a-80aa-4960-abc4-26de29271816

Reviews BYD Tang

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
BYD Tang
BYD Sealion 7
VS
The BYD Tang wears its SUV badge proudly — big, bold and businesslike, with a roomy cabin, high driving position and enough tech to turn family road trips into comfortable command missions. The BYD Sealion 7 is the sleeker, more carlike alternative, trading some bulk for sharper handling, better …
BYD Tang
XPeng G9
VS
BYD Tang and XPeng G9 are two compelling Chinese-built electric SUVs that target buyers looking for space and modern EV tech. The Tang leans toward practical value, strong charging and multi-powertrain options, while the XPeng G9 prioritizes premium refinement, advanced driver assistance and a …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-60
VW Tiguan
VS
Mazda CX-60 and VW Tiguan go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-60 or the VW Tiguan …
Kia Sportage
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the compact SUV showdown between the Kia Sportage and the Mazda CX-60, each vehicle demonstrates its unique strengths. The Kia Sportage captivates with its impressive tech features, spacious interior, and commendable fuel efficiency, making it ideal for both city commutes and long drives. …
Mazda CX-60
BYD Tang

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
64,300 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
530 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,630 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
235 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,955 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
575 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
517 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
680 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
380 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
BYD
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.