VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes EQS comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 585 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 80,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mercedes EQS?

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes EQS: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • visibly lighter
details

Mercedes EQS

  • considerably more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-60 is significantly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Mercedes EQS costs 80,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 37,245 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS offers substantially more range – reaching up to 920 km, about 857 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

EQS

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS offers considerably more power – delivering 585 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 258 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS delivers clearly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is visibly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,550 kg. The difference is around 660 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQS offers marginally more boot space – 610 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries barely more – 612 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQS is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £80,900
EQS

Mercedes EQS

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 367 - 585 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.5 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 810 - 920 km
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes EQS

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

Mercedes EQS

The Mercedes EQS is a silent, spaceship-like flagship that turns electric luxury into zen on wheels, wrapped in a swooping design that insists on being admired. Inside it’s all glassy screens and soft-touch surfaces that make long trips feel like first class, and the driving experience is composed and effortless — like a courteous butler with an electric heart.

details
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes EQS

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
80,900 - 117,500 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
810 - 920 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,550 - 2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
610 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,926 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
545 - 570 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
367 - 585 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
505 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
270 - 430 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.