VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes EQS – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-60 or Mercedes EQS fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-60 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Mercedes EQS costs 93900 £. That’s a price difference of around 51995 £.

As for range, the Mercedes EQS performs clearly better – achieving up to 816 km, about 752 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

EQS @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 544 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 217 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs slight better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Mercedes EQS tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 9 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQS pulls evident stronger with 858 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 308 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2545 kg. The difference is around 655 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQS offers minimal more room – 610 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQS performs minimal better – up to 1770 L, which is about 44 L more than the Mazda CX-60.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 barely noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 565 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mercedes EQS proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mercedes EQS is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £93,900
21C0401_005

Mercedes EQS

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 360 - 544 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.5 - 17.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 790 - 816 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

Mercedes EQS

The Mercedes-Benz EQS redefines luxury in the realm of electric vehicles, combining exceptional comfort with cutting-edge technology. Its sleek and aerodynamic design is a testament to both elegance and efficiency, setting new standards for the brand. Inside, the EQS offers a serene and spacious cabin equipped with the latest advancements, ensuring a refined driving experience.

details
21C0401_005 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
21C0401_007 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
21C0401_010 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
21C0401_012 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
21C0400_043 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a smile on your face; if you need family-friendly space, straightforward tech and everyday reliability, the Tayron is the smarter, less flashy choice.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes EQS
CX-60
EQS

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
93900 - 123500 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.2 kWh
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
790 - 816 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
118 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
2545 - 2655 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
610 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
5223 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1926 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1512 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1770 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
550 - 565 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
360 - 544 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
210 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
568 - 858 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
265 - 400 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its stylish design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and practicality. Ultimately, choosing between these two models boils down to personal preference, as each caters to distinct needs in the booming SUV market.
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a solid choice for larger families. Ultimately, the decision between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value in their respective categories.
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-60
VS
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, offering a more luxurious driving experience. Both models cater to different preferences, but each delivers a compelling package for compact SUV enthusiasts.
Mazda CX-60
Genesis GV70
VS
Mercedes EQE
Mercedes EQS
VS
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its dynamic handling, luxurious interior designs, and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those who value performance and upscale features.
Mercedes EQE SUV
Mercedes EQS
VS
In the realm of luxury electric vehicles, the battle between the Mercedes EQE SUV and the Mercedes EQS is one of intriguing contrasts. The EQE SUV, with its commanding presence and spacious design, offers an elevated driving experience ideal for those seeking versatility without compromising on elegance. On the other hand, the EQS stands as a testament to futuristic luxury, delivering a sedan experience that pairs cutting-edge technology with an emphasis on supreme comfort and aerodynamic efficiency.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.