VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes Marco Polo comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 57,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mercedes Marco Polo?

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes Marco Polo: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-60 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,814 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.

Marco Polo

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mercedes Marco Polo takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers marginally more torque with 550 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-60 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is noticeably lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,450 kg. The difference is around 560 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers somewhat more boot space – 670 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 100 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries only slightly more – 650 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes Marco Polo

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

Mercedes Marco Polo

The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.

details
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes Marco Polo

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
194 - 218 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
70 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Bus
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
670 L
Length
-
Length
5,140 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Height
-
Height
1,975 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
555 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.